ldv1452
- 69
- 0
Would a hydrocarbon with both double and triple bonds be considered just an alkyne...or both an alkene and alkyne?
The discussion revolves around the classification of hydrocarbons, specifically addressing whether a hydrocarbon containing both double and triple bonds should be classified as an alkene, an alkyne, or both. Additionally, participants explore the nature of aromatic hydrocarbons and their bonding characteristics.
Participants generally agree that a hydrocarbon with both double and triple bonds can be classified as both an alkene and an alkyne. However, there is disagreement regarding the possibility of an aromatic ring with all single bonds, with some asserting it cannot exist due to the requirements of aromaticity.
The discussion does not resolve the implications of classifying hydrocarbons with mixed bonding types, nor does it clarify the definitions of aromaticity in relation to bonding. There are also assumptions regarding the definitions of alkenes and alkynes that remain unexamined.
Ygggdrasil said:Both an alkene and an alkyne.
pzona said:I don't think there is such a thing as an aromatic ring with all single bonds. One of the requirements for aromaticity is each atom having overlapping p orbitals on both sides, which results in double bonds.
So short answer, no.