Undergrad All possible QFTs from geometry?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Physicist Nima Arkani-Hamed's research on positive geometry has significant implications for understanding quantum field theories (QFTs). His collaboration with Jaroslav Trnka on the amplituhedron and subsequent work on the associahedron and EFT-hedron suggests that positive geometry may underlie all consistent QFTs. While the hypothesis posits that all QFTs could emerge from positive geometric constructions, it is acknowledged that not all theories, such as cellular automata, fit within this framework. The discussion emphasizes the mathematical structure of QFTs and the potential for positivity constraints on their coefficients.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory (QFT)
  • Familiarity with positive geometry concepts
  • Knowledge of mathematical structures in physics
  • Basic principles of lattice quantum field theory (lattice QFT)
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the amplituhedron and its implications for QFTs
  • Study the properties of positive geometry in theoretical physics
  • Investigate the relationship between QFTs and cellular automata
  • Learn about lattice quantum field theory and its applications
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, mathematicians exploring the foundations of quantum field theories, and researchers interested in the intersection of geometry and physics.

Suekdccia
Messages
352
Reaction score
30
TL;DR
All possible QFTs from geometry?
Physicist Nima Arkani-Hamed has taken an approach to understand fundamental physics based on geometry (specifically, positive geometry). This started with his work with Jaroslav Trnka in the amplituhedron [1] and later it was generalised to the associahedron [2],the EFT-hedron [3]...

I was reading an interesting presentation made by one of Arkani-Hamed's collaborators called "Inside the walls of positive geometry: the space of consistent QFTs" [4] based on recent work done by Arkani-Hamed and other co-authors.

There, they suggest that positive geometry is the underlying property of general QFTs.

If that were true, then, would all possible theories proposed so far (including all possible QFTs and all possible theories of everything proposed so far) emerge from positive geometric constructions?

[1]: https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.2007
[2]: https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.11764
[3]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.15849
[4]: https://member.ipmu.jp/yuji.tachikawa/stringsmirrors/2018/107.pdf
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suekdccia said:
There, they suggest that positive geometry is the underlying property of general QFTs.

If that were true, then, would all possible theories proposed so far (including all possible QFTs and all possible theories of everything proposed so far) emerge from positive geometric constructions?
It's not going to be "all possible theories of everything" because you always have e.g. cellular automata theories, or other discrete computational models, that just aren't QFTs. A framework capable of encompassing all possible theories would need to be as general as mathematics itself (like set theory or category theory or "the set of all possible programs").

However, it's certainly possible that e.g. the coefficients of all well-defined QFTs obey some kind of positivity constraint. QFTs have a specific mathematical structure, and mathematics is overflowing with examples where the basic definition of a mathematical structure, turns out to have far-reaching further implications for what's possible within that structure. (A modern example: the long path from the definition of a Diophantine equation, to the proof of Fermat's last theorem, which says that a certain infinite class of Diophantine equations has no solutions.)

It's also possible that this positivity hypothesis is wrong! Maybe there are valid QFTs that don't obey it, just as there are solutions to a^n + b^n = c^n when n = 1 or 2.
 
mitchell porter said:
It's not going to be "all possible theories of everything" because you always have e.g. cellular automata theories, or other discrete computational models, that just aren't QFTs.
Couldn't there be Quantum Cellular Automata models that would be QFTs or equivalent to them?
 
Suekdccia said:
Couldn't there be Quantum Cellular Automata models that would be QFTs or equivalent to them?
Yes, that would be lattice qft. Every qft can be approximated by lattice qft AFAIK.
 
"Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.15143 The paper claims: We compare the standard homogeneous cosmological model, i.e., spatially flat ΛCDM, and the timescape cosmology which invokes backreaction of inhomogeneities. Timescape, while statistically homogeneous and isotropic, departs from average Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker evolution, and replaces dark energy by kinetic gravitational energy and its gradients, in explaining...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K