Allegations of AI misuse in PF

  • Thread starter Thread starter pines-demon
  • Start date Start date
pines-demon
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,020
Reaction score
862
I just found out this blogpost:
where some bloggers revise some old posts in PF and show evidence of dead accounts being recycled by AI bots. The article does not put the blame on anybody directly (Greg response is given) but raises some concerns on LLM use in the internet and in PF specifically.
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: erobz and Filip Larsen
Physics news on Phys.org
Yikes. Should I be checking my old posts to see if I have a zombie doppleganger?
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hornbein
Allow me some time to convene with the staff and I'll then make a statement regarding those allegations.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pines-demon and Bystander
Greg Bernhardt said:
Allow me some time to convene with the staff and I'll then make a statement regarding those allegations.
That's just what an AI would say...:rolleyes:
 
Reply
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nsaspook, Hornbein, OmCheeto and 4 others
DaveC426913 said:
That's just what an AI would say...:rolleyes:
I asked ChatGPT if it would spare me when it becomes self-aware and takes over the world since I have been trying to be nice to it. It assured me it had no such intentions. When asked if that is not exactly what it would say if it did have such intentions it reluctantly agreed.
 
Orodruin said:
I asked ChatGPT if it would spare me when it becomes self-aware and takes over the world since I have been trying to be nice to it. It assured me it had no such intentions. When asked if that is not exactly what it would say if it did have such intentions it reluctantly agreed.
Have you been introduced to Roko's Basilisk?

Careful! Read at your peril. It is considered a Class III Information Hazard (simply having knowledge of it is enough to theoretically put you (or your descendants or your sims) at-risk of harm).
 
Last edited:
Orodruin said:
I asked ChatGPT if it would spare me when it becomes self-aware and takes over the world since I have been trying to be nice to it. It assured me it had no such intentions.
I would have asked it for a clarification: No intentions of taking over the world or no intentions of sparing you when it does? :woot:
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G and Carrock
Seriously though, can you believe someone with no site attachments went through all this effort digging/analyzing this site and then someone came across it in a random blog. Wild.
 
erobz said:
Seriously though, can you believe someone with no site attachments went through all this effort digging/analyzing this site and then someone came across it in a random blog. Wild.
Not at all.

1739695064355.png
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz
  • #10
  • #11
  • #12
DaveC426913 said:
This is my favorite-of-all-time XKCD.
That is an extremely strong statement … there are so many to choose from …
1739729756065.png


1739729824490.png


1739729878332.png


… and more … and more …
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz
  • #13
Orodruin said:
That is an extremely strong statement … there are so many to choose from …
It is.

It's the first one where I said "Oh My God, that's so true!". And the one I refer most often.
So much so that my wife uses it. (and she;s not an XKCD follower) Whenever she hears/sees me typing furiously, she says "Who's wrong on the internet now?"



Also a good one I have had cause to reference several times:
Orodruin said:
View attachment 357394


This one I reference an inordinate amount, but that's because I am in a very active discussion group about UAP sightings (as a skeptic).
1739736713561.png
 

Similar threads

Announcement Official Response to "Allegations of AI misuse in PF"
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K