Allowed Reactions: Checking Rules & Mass Conservation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter genloz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reactions
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the rules governing allowed particle reactions, particularly focusing on conservation laws such as lepton number and energy considerations. Participants explore the complexities involved in determining whether specific reactions can occur, including the implications of weak interactions and potential violations of parity (P) and charge-parity (CP).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the criteria for determining if a reaction is allowed, questioning the conservation of lepton number and how to assess energy requirements for particle-antiparticle annihilation.
  • Another participant shares a classification table that organizes reactions by the fundamental forces and emphasizes the importance of center-of-mass (CM) energy in determining the feasibility of reactions.
  • It is noted that conservation laws typically include CM energy, charge, angular momentum, and lepton and baryon numbers, although exceptions exist for certain non-perturbative reactions.
  • A participant raises a question about how to identify conditions under which weak interactions violate P or CP, leading to a discussion on the complexities of CP-violation involving coupling constants and interference between processes.
  • Further elaboration on weak interactions indicates that they generally violate P, especially when involving W-bosons, while CP-violation requires specific conditions related to the phases of contributing processes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and approaches to the topic, indicating that there is no consensus on a singular method for determining allowed reactions. Multiple competing views on the complexities of conservation laws and weak interactions remain evident.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for clarity in the rules governing particle reactions, noting that the criteria can be complex and context-dependent, particularly regarding energy thresholds and the nature of weak interactions.

genloz
Messages
72
Reaction score
1
Is there an ultimate rule that can tell you what to check for to see if a reaction is allowed? I'm quite confused about what to check for in each situation? Is lepton number always conserved? How do you know whether there's enough energy to produce a given mass (eg e+e- -> tau+tau- isn't allowed due to mass conservation but how do you know how much energy is released when a particle and its antiparticle annihilate?) There seems to be too many things to check for which aren't organised logically and simplistically anywhere...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Funny, i have a table which helps me a lot to classify decays and reactions as possible or not. Plus CM energy.

So in my table i have one column for each force. I.e one for EM; one for weak, one for Strong.

Lepton and baryon # conservation is an emperical rule, and now you try to find out the lepton and baryon assymetry in the universe, since we live in a universe that has matter..

So your reaction [tex]e^+ + e^- \rightarrow \tau ^+ + \tau ^-[/tex] is possible if you have the right CM- energy, i.e CM energy > 2*restmass(tau-lepton)
 
yeah, there are quite a lot to check sometimes, but the usual ones are
conservation of CM energy, charge, angular momentum (spin).
lepton and baryon number are conserved in most reactions (exceptin some non-perturbative reactions, like sphalerons)
it is probably not as difficult to decide whether something can happen, it is how likely (branching ratio) things will happen that may give you more problems.
 
okay, that's very useful.. thanks... But these reponses made me think of another question... how do you know when a weak interaction will violate P or CP?
 
genloz said:
okay, that's very useful.. thanks... But these reponses made me think of another question... how do you know when a weak interaction will violate P or CP?

Weak nuclear interactions (almost) always violate P. If the decay involves a W-boson, it violates it maximallly; if it involves a Z-boson, it could violate it or conserve it.

CP is much harder. The first thing that needs to happen for CP-violation is that the coupling constant must be complex (have a nontrivial phase). However, this is a necessary but not sufficient condition. The other condition is that there has to be two processes that occur that can interfere with each other, each with *different* phases. In the Standard model, this typically means that there are two Feynman diagrams (typically involving loops with W-bosons and all three generations of quarks) that contribute to the same process. This is how CP-violation in [itex]K-\bar{K}[/itex] and [itex]B-\bar{B}[/itex] mixing work, for example.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K