Suggestion Amateur Theory Share - Physics, Biology, & More

  • Thread starter Thread starter kaeksen
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenges of sharing amateur theories in physics and biology on forums, emphasizing the need for a space that allows for speculation and constructive criticism. Participants express frustration with existing guidelines that often lead to locked threads, which they feel stifles learning and discussion. There is a call for a "wild speculation forum" where rules are relaxed, allowing for more open dialogue without the fear of being labeled a "crackpot." The importance of presenting ideas with a willingness to learn and receive feedback is highlighted, as well as the necessity of adhering to forum guidelines to foster productive discussions. Overall, the conversation underscores the desire for a balance between open exploration of ideas and maintaining scientific rigor.
  • #51
DaveC426913 said:
In Darken's defense, he can't be expected to accept his own topic of interest as lowering the quality of the site and being crackpot material. i.e. asking him why he would want to lower the quality of the site is kinda unfair.

The question wasn't aimed at any specific topic, it was meant to apply to general rule changes allowing a "free for all" to form. Rephrased: "why would you want to lower the quality of the site by having a free for all forum where the rules don't apply?".

There's no debating the point that such a place would lower the quality of the site. The rules are what maintain the standards.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top