JaredJames
- 2,818
- 22
DaveC426913 said:In Darken's defense, he can't be expected to accept his own topic of interest as lowering the quality of the site and being crackpot material. i.e. asking him why he would want to lower the quality of the site is kinda unfair.
The question wasn't aimed at any specific topic, it was meant to apply to general rule changes allowing a "free for all" to form. Rephrased: "why would you want to lower the quality of the site by having a free for all forum where the rules don't apply?".
There's no debating the point that such a place would lower the quality of the site. The rules are what maintain the standards.