MHB Amazing Math Discovery: 8281 is the Only 4 Digit Square with this Quirk

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wilmer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Discovery
AI Thread Summary
A unique four-digit number, n, exists where the two-digit number formed by the first two digits is one greater than the two-digit number formed by the last two digits, and n is a perfect square. This number is 8281. The discussion includes a challenge to prove its uniqueness without relying on extensive trial and error. Participants engage in a light-hearted exchange about the proof, with one asserting that the proof is intuitively obvious and another offering a mathematical expression to support the claim. The conversation highlights the mathematical curiosity surrounding this specific property of the number 8281.
Wilmer
Messages
303
Reaction score
0
Just discovered that:
if n is a 4 digit number such that the 2 digit number
formed by its 1st 2 digits is 1 greater than the
2 digit number formed by its last 2 digits,
and n is a square, then only one such n exists: 8281

Unfortunately, such a mathshaking discovery
will not bring down the price of groceries :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wilmer said:
Just discovered that:
if n is a 4 digit number such that the 2 digit number
formed by its 1st 2 digits is 1 greater than the
2 digit number formed by its last 2 digits,
and n is a square, then only one such n exists: 8281

Unfortunately, such a mathshaking discovery
will not bring down the price of groceries :(
Okay, so prove it's unique! And no making a big list of trial and error or you'll get coal in your stocking.

-Dan
 
I found it...you prove it...why should I have all the fun!
 
Wilmer said:
I found it...you prove it...why should I have all the fun!
I can prove it. It's intuitively obvious. (Quote from my Stat Mech professor.)

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
I can prove it. It's intuitively obvious. (Quote from my Stat Mech professor.)

-Dan
Proof below
let the 2nd 2 digits be n so 1st 2 digits (n+1) and number be $x^2$

$100(n+1) + n = 101n + 100 = x^2$

now $101n = x^2 - 100 = (x+10)(x-10)$ and as 101 > n and 101 is prime so

x + 10 = 101k as as x is 2 digit number k =1 so x = 91 and we get the number $91^2=8281$
 
No...no...
a = 1st digit, b = 2nd digit:

1010a + 101b - 1 = x^2 :)
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...

Similar threads

Back
Top