Amazing slo-mo of lightning strike.

  • Thread starter turbo
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Lightning
In summary: Yes, that was taken by a camera with a high frame rate and slowed for playback.In summary, this video is amazing. It shows the sequence of events that happens when lightning hits the ground. The change in dynamic range after the ground-hit (when max current was passing) must have been incredible - I'll bet that's one $$$$ camera.
  • #1
turbo
Gold Member
3,165
56
This is really beautiful - especially all the branching and arcing that occurs before ground contact is made and the main discharge occurs.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It makes me wonder why lightning zig-zags instead of following a straight path or a smooth arc, or a combination of both. There's a thread on this here:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=179870

but I don't see any consensus as to why that is the case.
 
  • #3
I would think it would have to be the path of least resistance. And since air is all pretty similar, and little difference with less resistance would be the way it'd go.
 
  • #4
That WAS slowed down significantly, right? That was just like 4th of July fireworks. So amazing!
 
  • #5
Yes. That was taken by a camera with a high frame rate and slowed for playback.
 
  • #6
You see how all the little branches wiggle around until one touches the ground and the hard strike follows that path. That's a pretty amazing video, I don't think I've ever seen anything like it and I've seen shows on lightning. Does lightning really look like that or has this been altered?
 
  • #7
Some troglodyte on there was saying it was all an effect.
 
  • #8
binzing said:
Some troglodyte on there was saying it was all an effect.

Yeah, anything on there is always considered a fake. If I ate a sandwhich in slow motion, they would say that was all an effect too. Awesome video by the way!
 
  • #9
LightbulbSun said:
Yeah, anything on there is always considered a fake. If I ate a sandwhich in slow motion, they would say that was all an effect too. Awesome video by the way!
Yep! Fake as all get-out! :rofl: Apparently, the cynical expert has never heard of chip bloom and doesn't know that camera sensors produce artifacts when overloaded. The change in dynamic range after the ground-hit (when max current was passing) must have been incredible - I'll bet that's one $$$$ camera.
 
  • #10
I have come SOOOOOOO close to buying the model rocket and spool of copper wire to shoot into a storm cloud. I'm afraid I'll get someone killed if I actually do try it. It's supposed to work and bring a lightning bolt right down the wire.
 
  • #11
Defennder said:
It makes me wonder why lightning zig-zags instead of following a straight path or a smooth arc, or a combination of both.

To some extent that reminds me of effects of the small program simulating diffusion by random walk, download it from my site:

http://www.chembuddy.com/?left=all&right=download

(ignore chemical calculators, scroll down to diffusion.zip). Seems like lightning starts as random walk (together with some kind of a path of the least resistance) at work.
 
  • #12
tribdog said:
You see how all the little branches wiggle around until one touches the ground and the hard strike follows that path.
Yes, that was what made me go gaga too. I saw this is on a show once, an animation of exactly that sequence of events. Many, many plasma steamers would randomly make their way through the air, ionizing it as they went. One streamer would reach the ground, establishing a continuous path of ionized air all the way from cloud to ground, and then wham! the bolt would flow from the ground to the cloud (not from cloud to ground). You can even see in the video the secondary flows of electricity after the first, as the charges balance.

Awesome. Awesome.
 
  • #13
tribdog said:
I have come SOOOOOOO close to buying the model rocket and spool of copper wire to shoot into a storm cloud. I'm afraid I'll get someone killed if I actually do try it. It's supposed to work and bring a lightning bolt right down the wire.

Lightening rockets. This is how some research in lightning is conducted.
 
  • #14
DaveC426913 said:
You can even see in the video the secondary flows of electricity after the first, as the charges balance.

Awesome. Awesome.

I noticed the secondary flows too. Very cool stuff. It all happens so fast in real time, that it just looks like one strike to us, but really there's multiple flows of electricity reaching from cloud to ground.
 
  • #15
Speaking of lightning, I am always reminded by the worst storm I have ever seen in my life to this date.

During the morning of May 31, 1998 a warm front moved quickly north across the region. Rapid destabilization occurred during the afternoon as a cold front pressed south toward the region. Lines of severe thunderstorms formed and moved rapidly east across New York and Western New England. Several of these storms became tornadic over Saratoga, Albany, Rensselaer, and Washington counties in New York and Bennington county Vermont. Straight line wind damage occurred in most counties of NWSFO Albany's County Warning Area. Cloud to ground lightning rates over the region reached 15,000 strokes per hour, rates not observed before over this region.

Source: http://cstar.cestm.albany.edu:7773/past/may31a/may31.htm"

250 strokes per hour.
4.16 strokes per second.

It was like the finale of a fireworks show, just constant lightning strikes. I was only 9 then and I was scared to death because we did have a tornado warning for our county and an F3 tornado just missed us by about 8 miles to the east of us.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #16
LightbulbSun said:
250 strokes per hour.
4.16 strokes per second.

Something wrong with your math.
 
  • #17
Borek said:
Something wrong with your math.
per minute.

1 stroke every 15 seconds.
 
  • #18
Borek said:
Something wrong with your math.

Not necessarily, If I was in the middle of 250 lightning strokes in an hour I'd probably have about 4 strokes per second.
 
  • #19
Easily, and by far, the best shot of a lightning strike I have ever seen captured on video. And I have seen many, having shown a dozen or so videos on lightning in my physics classes. There's this NOVA special of a few years ago where the narrator says "watch this rare slow motion footage of a lightning strike on a factory ..." (etc.). That was a weak fart compared to this shot!
 
  • #20
LightbulbSun said:
Speaking of lightning, I am always reminded by the worst storm I have ever seen in my life to this date.

During the morning of May 31, 1998 a warm front moved quickly north across the region. Rapid destabilization occurred during the afternoon as a cold front pressed south toward the region. Lines of severe thunderstorms formed and moved rapidly east across New York and Western New England. Several of these storms became tornadic over Saratoga, Albany, Rensselaer, and Washington counties in New York and Bennington county Vermont. Straight line wind damage occurred in most counties of NWSFO Albany's County Warning Area. Cloud to ground lightning rates over the region reached 15,000 strokes per hour, rates not observed before over this region.

Source: http://cstar.cestm.albany.edu:7773/past/may31a/may31.htm"

250 strokes per hour.
4.16 strokes per second.

It was like the finale of a fireworks show, just constant lightning strikes. I was only 9 then and I was scared to death because we did have a tornado warning for our county and an F3 tornado just missed us by about 8 miles to the east of us.

You mean:

15,000 strokes per hour.
250 strokes per minute.
4.15 strokes per second.

4.15 * 60 = 250
250 * 60 = 15,000

I'm right and the others are wrong. o:)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #21
kmarinas86 said:
You mean:

15,000 strokes per hour.
250 strokes per minute.
4.15 strokes per second.

4.15 * 60 = 250
250 * 60 = 15,000

I'm right and the others are wrong. o:)

Yes. :tongue2: I was going to say it definitely wasn't one stroke every fifteen seconds. I get that in a decent, moderate thunderstorm. This was just constant lightning strikes without interruption. I wish I had video footage of this, but I was only 9 back then, and scared to death.

Besides I had to take cover cause there was the imminent threat of a tornado.
 

1. What causes a lightning strike?

A lightning strike is caused by an electrical discharge between a cloud and the ground, or between two different clouds. This discharge is a result of the buildup of electrical charges within the clouds and the surrounding air.

2. How do you capture slo-mo footage of lightning?

To capture slo-mo footage of lightning, high-speed cameras are used. These cameras can record thousands of frames per second, allowing for slow-motion playback of the lightning strike.

3. Is it dangerous to film lightning strikes?

Filming lightning strikes can be dangerous, as it involves being in close proximity to the strike. It is important to take proper safety precautions and to avoid filming in open areas during a thunderstorm.

4. How do scientists study lightning?

Scientists use a variety of techniques to study lightning, including high-speed cameras, lightning mapping systems, and satellite imagery. They also conduct experiments in controlled environments to better understand the physics of lightning.

5. Can lightning strikes be predicted?

While scientists have made advancements in predicting the likelihood of lightning strikes, it is still a difficult and unpredictable phenomenon. Lightning can strike anywhere within a thunderstorm, and it is important to always take proper safety precautions during a storm.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
605
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
8K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
9K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
911
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
4K
Back
Top