Amount of Energy to Fuse Two Atoms

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JordanGo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms Energy Fuse
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the energy required to fuse two atoms, specifically a sodium atom and a hydrogen atom to form magnesium. The primary equation used is based on the mass-energy equivalence principle, E=mc², where the energy released is determined by the mass difference of the reactants and products. A calculator for this purpose is available at the National Nuclear Data Center's website. Additionally, the conversation highlights the importance of overcoming the Coulomb barrier and the role of the strong nuclear force in fusion reactions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mass-energy equivalence (E=mc²)
  • Familiarity with nuclear forces, particularly the strong nuclear force
  • Knowledge of the Coulomb barrier and its significance in nuclear fusion
  • Basic concepts of atomic structure and nuclear reactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the calculation of the Coulomb barrier using the formula E = k Z₁ Z₂ e²/r
  • Explore the concept of exothermic vs. endothermic reactions in nuclear fusion
  • Study the role of temperature in achieving fusion conditions in plasma physics
  • Investigate the implications of fusion reactions for energy production and nuclear physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those interested in nuclear physics, energy production, and atomic interactions. This discussion is beneficial for anyone seeking to understand the principles of nuclear fusion and the calculations involved.

JordanGo
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if there was a simplified equation to determine the amount of energy required to fuse two atoms together (for example a sodium atom with a hydrogen atom to form a magnesium atom).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
JordanGo said:
I was wondering if there was a simplified equation to determine the amount of energy required to fuse two atoms together (for example a sodium atom with a hydrogen atom to form a magnesium atom).

Yes. You simply find the difference in mass * c2 between the starting products and ending products.

MNa-23*c2 + MH-1*c2 - MMg-24*c2 = Energy released

There is a simple calculator located at this link which does it for you: http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/qcalc/
 
Thank you, I wasn't sure if it was as simply as E=mc2 or there was something else more to it. But I guess not! Thanks again, highly appreciate you time!

Actually, I thought of something...

Does it not depend on the energy required to hold the atoms together instead of the energy of rest mass?
 
Last edited:
JordanGo said:
Thank you, I wasn't sure if it was as simply as E=mc2 or there was something else more to it. But I guess not! Thanks again, highly appreciate you time!

Actually, I thought of something...

Does it not depend on the energy required to hold the atoms together instead of the energy of rest mass?

It does not require energy to hold the nucleus together, that is done by the strong nuclear force. When you fuse two nuclei together, if the end product of the reaction is less massive than the combined mass of the nuclei prior to fusion, the reaction is exothermic and will release energy. If it is more massive then it is endothermic and will require energy to react. Do you know what energy is?
 
Not sure... Can you describe this energy? Don't hold back on description, I'm in my third year university physics, so the more complex the better!
 
JordanGo said:
Not sure... Can you describe this energy? Don't hold back on description, I'm in my third year university physics, so the more complex the better!

To my knowledge energy is the ability of one system to perform work on another. If a proton and a neutron are being held together inside the nucleus, is work being done? No. This is similar to a book being left on a table. Is work being performed to keep the book on the table? No, there is no change in the system so no work is being done. Since no work is being done then energy isn't a useful way of describing anything in the system. AKA it takes zero energy to keep a book on a table or to keep two nucleons bound together.
 
@JordanGo - are you, perhaps, referring to the kinetic energy required to overcome the Coulomb repulsion between the two nuclei in order to get them close enough together for fusion to be able to happen?

For nuclei whose combinations are below Iron, fusion is either exothermic or just doesn't occur (an example of the latter would be 4He + 4He → 8Be). But before the reaction can happen you do need to provide enough energy to allow the nuclei to overcome the electromagnetic force and get to within the (fm-scale) range of one another where the nuclear force kicks in. Once the latter happens, though, it releases further energy, while the original KE remains.
 
Yes, that is what I was wondering about. Thank you Drakkith, that was also a very good answer, its interesting!

Now, I've never taking a particle class yet, I'm just being curious! So can someone do a worked example for me: let's say you want to fuse a hydrogen atom to a sodium atom to make magnesium (there's no isotopes). How much energy is required to do this?
 
JordanGo said:
Yes, that is what I was wondering about. Thank you Drakkith, that was also a very good answer, its interesting!

Now, I've never taking a particle class yet, I'm just being curious! So can someone do a worked example for me: let's say you want to fuse a hydrogen atom to a sodium atom to make magnesium (there's no isotopes). How much energy is required to do this?

Use the link I provided in my first post.
 
  • #10
Oh, were you asking how to calculate the coulomb barrier? In that case the equation for a single particle pair is E = \frac{k Z_1 Z_2 e^2}{r} where k is the coulomb constant, the Z's are the atomic numbers, and r is the interaction radius.

Calculating the temperature for fusion for a collection of particles is a bit more complicated as there are quantum mechanical and statistical effects to consider. It is lower than the required energy for a single particle.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K