An Empirical Inductive Method.Applied to a Panpsychism Model of Consciousness

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion presents an empirical inductive method for exploring metaphysical concepts, specifically through a panpsychism model of consciousness. It outlines three steps: stating premises supported by experience, formulating an inductive model, and testing the model's explanatory strength. The author emphasizes the importance of experiential evidence and introduces the concept of union, derived from ancient yogic practices, as a means to understand consciousness. The discussion aims to bridge the gap between empirical science and non-physical aspects of consciousness.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Charles Peirce's pragmatism
  • Familiarity with metaphysical theories, particularly panpsychism
  • Knowledge of the concept of union (samadhi) in yogic practices
  • Basic grasp of inductive reasoning and its application in philosophical contexts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of panpsychism in contemporary consciousness studies
  • Explore the historical context and practices of union (samadhi) in ancient Indian philosophy
  • Study the relationship between consciousness and physical processes in metaphysics
  • Investigate the role of empirical evidence in non-physical sciences
USEFUL FOR

Philosophers, cognitive scientists, and anyone interested in the intersection of metaphysics and consciousness studies will benefit from this discussion.

  • #121
Les Sleeth said:
My theory is that it would show something like the alpha state, and so not really reflect what is going on inside. But of course I don't know. It would be fun to submit to tests to find out. :smile:
:smile: I don't have any more questions- for now. Thanks again.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #122
honestrosewater, I thought you might find this http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/101/46/16369" .
I'm not certain if these mediation techniques are similar to Les's practice of union. What you will see is that there are basically two stages to the mediations one consists of a visualization and the other is the experience of "nothingness". Both of these states corespond to two very distinct brain states and i would suspect the latter may be similar to union. The experience of nothingness is the highest aim of these mediatators, this state is apparently hard to describe but is often thought of as experiencing the very base state of conciousness. In any case there definitely is a very observable effect in the brain for these meditators. Personally I don't know how much it means to me that we can observe different brain states in meditators especially if you see conciousness as not being physical.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
645
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 135 ·
5
Replies
135
Views
23K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K