MHB An intriguing system of equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Hi MHB,

I've recently come across a system of equation problem that I could not solve it fully, I don't know how to prove that system, the resulted polynomial has only three real roots.

Problem:

Solve for all real solutions in terms of $k$ for the system below:

$x(x^2+9k^2)=2z(x^2+k^2)$

$y(y^2+9k^2)=2x(y^2+k^2)$

$z(z^2+9k^2)=2y(z^2+k^2)$

It's no hard to see that when $x=y=z$, then we have the solutions:

$(x,\,y,\,z)=(-\sqrt{7}a,\,-\sqrt{7}a,\,-\sqrt{7}a)\stackrel{\text{or}}{=}(0,\,0,\,0)\stackrel{\text{or}}{=}(\sqrt{7}a,\,\sqrt{7}a,\,\sqrt{7}a)$

But I don't know what other conclusions that I could draw when I considered the condition where $x\ne y \ne z$ that could lead me to solve for this problem.

Wolfram has confirmed that those are the only real solutions the the given system, and I tried, using the knowledge that I borrowed from inequality, geometry, function, etc and nope, nothing helped. And here I am, hoping to gain some useful advice from the members to solve this system successfully.

Any help would be much appreciated.

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This is just a hunch but the cyclic nature of the system along with the only solution being $x = y = z$ suggests that $x < y$ implies $y < x$ and vice versa, and same for $(y, z)$ and $(z, x)$ (or the other way around) so that the only solution can be $x = y = z$. I haven't tried, but if you haven't tried that it seems like it may be fruitful.
 
Thanks Bacterius for your reply and yes, I think I was able to complete the solution based on your suggestion and here is my work:

First, if we rewrite the first given equation as $\dfrac{2z}{x}=\dfrac{x^2+9k^2}{x^2+k^2}$, we see that $\dfrac{2z}{x}>0$ for all real $x$ and $k$.

This means both $x$ and $z$ are either both positive or both negative. By the same token, we also have $x$ and $y$ are both positive or negative, and so are $y$ and $z$.

Since $x^2,\,9k^2,\,k^2$ are all positive and if we apply AM-GM inequality on those, we see that

$x^2+9k^2\ge 2(\sqrt{9x^2k^2})=2(3xk)=6xk$ and $x^2+k^2\ge 2(\sqrt{x^2k^2})=2(xk)=2xk$

Now, if we consider the case where $x$ and $z$ are both positive, we see that

$\dfrac{2z}{x}=\dfrac{x^2+9k^2}{x^2+k^2}\ge \dfrac{6xk}{2xk}=3$

$2z\ge 3x$

$\therefore z>x$

Similarly, from $\dfrac{2x}{y}=\dfrac{y^2+9k^2}{y^2+k^2}$, we have $x>y$ and this suggests $z>y$ but from $\dfrac{2y}{z}=\dfrac{z^2+9k^2}{z^2+k^2}$, we have $y>z$. This leads to a contradiction.

The other case for which all $x,\,y,\,z$ are negative works the same way and so, there is only one condition in the given system of equation that we need to consider, and that is when $x=y=z$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top