- #1

- 9

- 0

- I
- Thread starter GregoryC
- Start date

- #1

- 9

- 0

- #2

russ_watters

Mentor

- 19,945

- 6,431

We don't have to "believe", we do it.What makes us believe we can represent an analog universe with digital representations?

Yes. So what's wrong with that?We can only know the radius of a circle or it's circumference with precision because Pi is an approximation.

- #3

sophiecentaur

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 25,194

- 4,816

Pi is a transcendental number and, as you say, cannot be represented in a limited number of digits. There are other transcendental numbers (e) and also many familiar irrational numbers (√2) for instance.

We don't claim to represent the Universe perfectly - all our Scientific Laws are based on limited measurement accuracy. Everything is calculated 'near enough' to justify the many theories in which the Maths assumes a continuum of values.

No need to lose any sleep over this - unless you want to stray into the realms of Philosophy (third year work and beyond!!!)

- #4

CWatters

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 10,529

- 2,297

Is the universe analog? I thought the jury was still out on that.What makes us believe we can represent an analog universe with digital representations?

Can you explain why we can a only calculate the circumference with precision because pi is an approximation? Normally approximations reduce precision.We can only know the radius of a circle or it's circumference with precision because Pi is an approximation.

- #5

- 52

- 4

Neuron activity seems pretty digital to me.

- #6

Drakkith

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

- 21,019

- 4,834

I believe neurons have both analog and digital "properties", but that's a topic for the biology forum, not this thread.Neuron activity seems pretty digital to me.

- #7

jbriggs444

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

2019 Award

- 9,316

- 4,017

Pi is exact. Any real figure is only approximately a circle.

- #8

- 314

- 18

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist–Shannon_sampling_theoremWhat makes us believe we can represent an analog universe with digital representations?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shannon–Hartley_theorem

- #9

sophiecentaur

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 25,194

- 4,816

Between Scientists and Science there is always the 'measurement barrier'. Every measurement has a certain resolution and accuracy and, as soon as we write it down or process it in a digital processor, it becomes a discrete quantity.

Before digital processors had sufficient capacity, we used to employ Analogue Computers which would take the analogue values from sensors and potential dividers and, with clever use of Op Amps, would produce an Analogue output signal. The whole information chain used continuous variables (Volts and current values). However, of course there was noise /hum / drift etc and the output value was not an 'exact' outcome. So you could not actually rely on a set of monotonic input variables giving you a monotonic answer.

- #10

- 72

- 10

Actually they do, the chemical aspect is analog, and the patterns can be argued for digital. But yeah like you said, not in this thread's current location.I believe neurons have both analog and digital "properties", but that's a topic for the biology forum, not this thread.

- #11

- 67

- 21