Analysis: Prove f(u+v)=f(u)+f(v) implies f(x)=f(1)x

  • Thread starter Thread starter pcvt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that a function f: R->R satisfying the property f(u+v) = f(u) + f(v) implies f(x) = f(1)x for all rational x. The proof begins with demonstrating the property for natural numbers using induction and extends to rational numbers by examining the behavior of f at fractions and utilizing the additive identity. The continuity of f further allows the conclusion that f(x) = f(1)x holds for all real x.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of functional equations, specifically Cauchy's functional equation.
  • Proficiency in mathematical induction techniques.
  • Knowledge of properties of real numbers, including additive identities and inverses.
  • Familiarity with continuity in mathematical functions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Cauchy's functional equation in real analysis.
  • Learn advanced techniques in mathematical induction for proving properties of functions.
  • Explore the relationship between continuity and functional equations in real-valued functions.
  • Investigate the implications of the additive identity in various number sets, including integers and rationals.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying real analysis, and anyone interested in functional equations and their properties will benefit from this discussion.

pcvt
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose that a function f R->R has the property that f(u+v) = f(u)+f(v). Prove that f(x)=f(1)x for all rational x. Then, show that if f(x) is continuous that f(x)=f(1)x for all real x.

The Attempt at a Solution


I've proved that f(x)=f(1)x for all natural x by breaking up x into f(1)+f(x-1) and using induction, but I can't figure out how to do it for all rationals.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is

f(1/n)+...+f(1/n)

? (if you take n sums)
 
f(1)=f(1/2+1/2)=f(1/2)+f(1/2), right? That means f(1/2)=f(1)*(1/2). Can you show f(1)=f(1/3+1/3+1/3)=f(1/3)+f(1/3)+f(1/3)? How about using induction to show f(1/n)=f(1)*(1/n)??
 
Ok, I see that I can show it for f(1/n). How can I combine the two though, since I don't have a rule to say f(m/n)=f(1)*(m/n)? Also, how can I include negative numbers?

Thanks!
 
I would be inclined to look at the basic "sets of numbers" and use their defining properties. For example, the "natural numbers" or "counting numbers" are defined by "induction"- 1 is a natural number and, if n is a natural number, then n+ 1 is also. Obviously, for any number, x, f(x)= f(x)(1). Use induction to show that for any positive integer, n, then f(n)= f(x)n and then take x= 1. (You will use the general "x" below.)

The "whole numbers" are just the positive integers together with 0. And 0 is the "additive identity", for any positive integer, n, n+ 0= n. Look at f(n+ 0)= f(n)+ f(0).

The "integers" includes the negative integers: we now have additive inverse. Any negative integer is of the form -n for some positive integer n. f(n+ (-n))= f(n)+ f(-n) and, of course, f(n+(-n))= f(0).

Finally, look at numbers of the form 1/n, n non-zero. Obviously, n(1/n)= 1 so f(n(1/n))= f(1). But you have already shown that f(nx)= f(x)n. So take x= 1/n.
 
HallsofIvy said:
I would be inclined to look at the basic "sets of numbers" and use their defining properties. For example, the "natural numbers" or "counting numbers" are defined by "induction"- 1 is a natural number and, if n is a natural number, then n+ 1 is also. Obviously, for any number, x, f(x)= f(x)(1). Use induction to show that for any positive integer, n, then f(n)= f(x)n and then take x= 1. (You will use the general "x" below.)

The "whole numbers" are just the positive integers together with 0. And 0 is the "additive identity", for any positive integer, n, n+ 0= n. Look at f(n+ 0)= f(n)+ f(0).

The "integers" includes the negative integers: we now have additive inverse. Any negative integer is of the form -n for some positive integer n. f(n+ (-n))= f(n)+ f(-n) and, of course, f(n+(-n))= f(0).

Finally, look at numbers of the form 1/n, n non-zero. Obviously, n(1/n)= 1 so f(n(1/n))= f(1). But you have already shown that f(nx)= f(x)n. So take x= 1/n.


So helpful, got it from there. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K