Anderson Localization: Decoherence Explanation?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Descartz2000
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the explanation of Anderson Localization, specifically whether decoherence is the best framework for understanding this phenomenon. The scope includes theoretical aspects and conceptual clarifications related to quantum mechanics and disorder in mediums.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested, Conceptual clarification, Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether decoherence is the best explanation for Anderson Localization.
  • Another participant argues that Anderson Localization is fundamentally a coherent interference effect, explaining it through the concept of quantum paths and their phases in a disordered medium.
  • The explanation includes the idea that paths returning to the origin contribute to localization through constructive interference, contrasting with paths leading to different points which do not have this property.
  • A request for introductory material on the subject is made, indicating interest in further exploration of the topic.
  • A suggestion for a specific book is provided, noting its suitability for those familiar with second quantization, but indicating it may not be introductory.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role of decoherence in explaining Anderson Localization, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the relationship between decoherence and Anderson Localization, and assumptions regarding the nature of quantum paths and their contributions to localization are not fully explored.

Descartz2000
Messages
138
Reaction score
1
Is decoherence the best way to explain the phenomenon of Anderson Localization?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think so. Anderson localization is a coherent interference effect.
one way to explain it is as follows - think of a quantum particle released inside a disordered medium at point A. The amplitude for that particle to reach to a distant point B in the medium is a sum of all possible paths from A to B. in a disordered medium each path is accompanied with a different (random) phase and therefore you get random interference, and the particle shows diffusion. but this is not Anderson Localization.

Localization kicks in when you take into account the paths that lead from A back to A. there are many such paths of course, but they come in pairs: from A to A in a loop, and from A to A in the same loop but in the opposite direction. Note that such pairs do not exist for paths from A to a different point B. The point is that the two reversed loops from A to A are accompanied with exactly the same phase! - it is the same path, only reversed. as a result, the particle has a constructive interference to remain in point A - the origin. You can show, that as disorder is increased, the number of such loops increases very sharply. this is the correction to diffusion that leads to Anderson localization.
 
That's a nice explanation MGH. Do you happen to know some introductory material into the subject? (graduate level)
 
Anderson Localization and Its Ramifications: Disorder, Phase Coherence and Electron Correlation

Springer 2003

If you are familiar with the second quantization treatment, maybe not quite an intro. book - but solid.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
730
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K