Anderson Localization: Decoherence Explanation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Descartz2000
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Decoherence is not considered the best explanation for Anderson Localization, which is primarily a coherent interference effect. In a disordered medium, a quantum particle's amplitude to reach a distant point is influenced by random phases along various paths, leading to diffusion rather than localization. Localization occurs when considering paths returning to the origin, where pairs of reversed loops create constructive interference, allowing the particle to remain at point A. As disorder increases, the number of such paths increases sharply, correcting diffusion and resulting in Anderson Localization. For those seeking introductory material, "Anderson Localization and Its Ramifications" from Springer 2003 is recommended.
Descartz2000
Messages
138
Reaction score
1
Is decoherence the best way to explain the phenomenon of Anderson Localization?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think so. Anderson localization is a coherent interference effect.
one way to explain it is as follows - think of a quantum particle released inside a disordered medium at point A. The amplitude for that particle to reach to a distant point B in the medium is a sum of all possible paths from A to B. in a disordered medium each path is accompanied with a different (random) phase and therefore you get random interference, and the particle shows diffusion. but this is not Anderson Localization.

Localization kicks in when you take into account the paths that lead from A back to A. there are many such paths of course, but they come in pairs: from A to A in a loop, and from A to A in the same loop but in the opposite direction. Note that such pairs do not exist for paths from A to a different point B. The point is that the two reversed loops from A to A are accompanied with exactly the same phase! - it is the same path, only reversed. as a result, the particle has a constructive interference to remain in point A - the origin. You can show, that as disorder is increased, the number of such loops increases very sharply. this is the correction to diffusion that leads to Anderson localization.
 
That's a nice explanation MGH. Do you happen to know some introductory material into the subject? (graduate level)
 
Anderson Localization and Its Ramifications: Disorder, Phase Coherence and Electron Correlation

Springer 2003

If you are familiar with the second quantization treatment, maybe not quite an intro. book - but solid.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
852
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K