Angular acceleration/tangential velocity

  • Thread starter Thread starter buffgilville
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angular Velocity
Click For Summary
The problem involves two disks, A and B, rotating together, with disk B having a radius that is 2/3 that of disk A. The ratio of the tangential velocities at the rims of the disks is calculated as 2/3, indicating that disk A's tangential velocity is greater. For kinetic energy, the ratio is derived from the moment of inertia, leading to the conclusion that the kinetic energy of disk A is 9/4 times that of disk B. The calculations utilize the formulas for tangential velocity and kinetic energy, assuming equal mass distribution. This analysis highlights the relationship between angular velocity, radius, and kinetic energy in rotating systems.
buffgilville
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
Can someone please help me on how to solve this problem?

Two disks, A and B, are cemented together rotating with angular velocity a . The radius of the small disk B is 2/3 the radius of the larger disk A.

a) Calculate the ratio of the tangential velocity of a point on the rim of disk A to the tangential velocity of a point on the rim of disk B?

b) If the two disks in problem a have an angular velocity of w, calculate the ratio of the kinetic energy of disk A to the kinetic energy of disk B. Assume that each disk has a mass M.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a) How is, in general, tangential velocity at a radius "R" from the rotation axis coupled with angular velocity?
b) How is the kinetic energy of a rotating object related to the moment of inerta of the object with respect to the rotation axis and the angular velocity?
Assume that the mass distribution is equal for both disks.
(Use, for example, that each disk has a constant density in your calculations.)
 
Last edited:


a) To solve this problem, we can use the formula for tangential velocity, which is v = rw, where r is the radius of the disk and w is the angular velocity. Since the radius of disk B is 2/3 of the radius of disk A, we can calculate the ratio of the tangential velocities as follows:

vA/vB = (rA*w)/(rB*w) = (rA/rB) = (2/3)

Therefore, the tangential velocity of a point on the rim of disk A is 2/3 times the tangential velocity of a point on the rim of disk B.

b) To calculate the kinetic energy of each disk, we can use the formula KE = 1/2*I*w^2, where I is the moment of inertia and w is the angular velocity. Since both disks have the same angular velocity, we can ignore it in the ratio calculation.

KEA/KEB = (1/2*IA)/(1/2*IB) = IA/IB

The moment of inertia for a disk is given by I = 1/2*MR^2, where M is the mass of the disk and R is the radius. Substituting in the values for disk A and B, we get:

KEA/KEB = (1/2*M*A*R^2)/(1/2*M*B*(2/3*R)^2) = (1/2*M*A*R^2)/(1/2*M*B*4/9*R^2) = (9/4)*(A/B)

Therefore, the kinetic energy of disk A is 9/4 times the kinetic energy of disk B.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K