Annihilation of Matter/Antimatter

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter D4rthV4D3r
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Annihilation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the annihilation of matter and antimatter, specifically whether antimatter can be used to selectively remove neutrons from radioactive elements like Uranium without disturbing protons. Participants concluded that when matter and antimatter annihilate, they produce gamma rays and other particles that interact with surrounding materials, making it impossible to target neutrons without affecting the overall atomic structure. The properties of anti-neutrons differ from neutrons, and Uranium's lack of stable isotopes further complicates any theoretical application of this concept.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of particle physics, specifically matter and antimatter interactions.
  • Knowledge of atomic structure, particularly the roles of protons and neutrons.
  • Familiarity with gamma radiation and its effects on matter.
  • Basic concepts of isotopes and their stability, especially in relation to Uranium.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and interactions of anti-neutrons in particle physics.
  • Study the effects of gamma radiation on surrounding materials and biological systems.
  • Explore the concept of isotopes and their stability in nuclear chemistry.
  • Investigate current advancements in antimatter research and potential applications.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, nuclear chemists, and researchers interested in antimatter applications and the fundamental interactions of particles.

D4rthV4D3r
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
When anti matter and matter come into contact do they only annihilate each other leaving everything else undisturbed? Or does the resulting energy destroy/tear apart nearby particles?

The reason I ask, assuming that the result is the former, if antimatter were to be harnessed could anti-neutrons be fired at a radioactive element (say Uranium), getting rid of neutrons but leaving the protons undisturbed (so it stays Uranium) until it reaches a stable ratio of protons and neutrons.

I realize this is currently impossible with our means, but in theory could it work? I couldn't find any discussion of this elsewhere on the internet.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How much matter-antimatter are we talking about?
Two particles of matter-antimatter won't cause too much fuss.
 
When antimatter and matter annihilate, they produce a number of other particles, such as gamma rays. These products of the reaction WILL interact with surrounding material. I would say off the top of my head that no, you could not use antimatter to get rid of single neutrons in an atom without disturbing anything else. How much disturbance you would get I do not know though.
 
the properties of neutrons and anti-neutrons are different as much as i know...so i doubt that it would work even in theory...
 
Since Uranium has no stable isotopes, even if you used a magic wand to add or remove neutrons this would not work.
 
of course the reaction would produce 2 photons of gamma. since gamma is ionizing radiation, the disturbance is always possible.
but I'm not sure if it possible to annihilate neutron inside radionuclide in this way.
 
Okay, first of all what type of Antimatter and what type of matter are you talking about?;what are the charge patterns?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Uranium has no stable isotopes

Could this system work using both anti-neutrons, and p-bars?
 
Yes, but it really depends on what matter you want to make
 
  • #10
May I ask how would you force other matter's charges outward
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K