Annihilation results in an extreme burst of energy

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Syed Ammar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Annihilation Energy
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Annihilation of antimatter results in an extreme burst of energy, theoretically allowing spacecraft to reach speeds up to half the speed of light. However, practical challenges exist, including the need for specialized magnetic confinement containers to store antimatter safely. Current technology limits the isolation of antimatter, with estimates suggesting it would take thousands to millions of years to produce enough antimatter to match the energy of a nuclear bomb. Efficient utilization of this energy remains unclear, as conventional designs waste significant energy and heat.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of antimatter and its properties
  • Knowledge of magnetic confinement techniques
  • Familiarity with energy density concepts
  • Basic principles of spacecraft propulsion systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research magnetic confinement methods for antimatter storage
  • Explore advanced propulsion systems for spacecraft
  • Study the energy density of antimatter compared to other fuels
  • Investigate current antimatter production techniques at CERN
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, aerospace engineers, and anyone interested in advanced propulsion technologies and the theoretical applications of antimatter in energy production.

Syed Ammar
Messages
25
Reaction score
1
Annihilation results in an extreme burst of energy... If enough antimatter is isolated, it can be utilized for annihilation which can converted into useful energy...This can make us approximately
half as fast as light... Just wanted to have ur comments ..?? Is it possible...?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Syed Ammar said:
Annihilation results in an extreme burst of energy... If enough antimatter is isolated, it can be utilized for annihilation which can converted into useful energy...
Correct

...This can make us approximately half as fast as light..
Not sure about this.

..Is it possible...?
Yes it is, theoretically. No such vehicle has yet been constructed. Antimatter is just not gasoline you can store in your tank. Antimatter annihilates with all types of 'matter'. So you need special 'magnetic confinement containers' to store them. You can't leave the antimatter to touch any type of 'matter' be it the walls of an 'antimatter engine' or the say on the whole 'the vehicle'. So it is not as simple as that for practical reasons.
 
What do you mean by "This can make us approximately half as fast as light" ? There seems to be some context missing from your question.
 
I think it's a misconception, and he wanted to say that it allows us (theoretically) to create really effective in speeding up machines - eg spaceships. Of course as already pointed out, this is just a theoretical result, and practically by today's technology, we can't isolate enough antimatter ...
If I recall well, a CERN scientist had said in public (due to the "Illuminati" book), that taking all the accelerators on earth, and the rate they produce antimatter which we can isolate, we need some thousands to millions of years to isolate enough antimatter to give the same power as one nuclear bomb.
 
While antimatter would have enough energy density to let a spacecraft reach half the speed of light with a reasonable amount of fuel, it is unclear how to use this energy in an efficient way. The easiest design (use it as in a chemical rocket) will waste a large fraction of the energy and heat the spacecraft - and that really limits the thrust you can get. More realistic designs are much more inefficient.

If I recall well, a CERN scientist had said in public (due to the "Illuminati" book), that taking all the accelerators on earth, and the rate they produce antimatter which we can isolate, we need some thousands to millions of years to isolate enough antimatter to give the same power as one nuclear bomb.
In the same way: all the antimatter created in the last decades, assuming we would have it all available at the same time, could be used to boil a cup of water. Unfortunately, we don't have long-term storages for them. And we have cheaper ways to boil water.
 
Thanks everyone... and by the way, I did commit a mistake in the question.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
11K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
777
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K