Please take a look at the file "Feynman.pdf". The ratio rate for the two decays is shown in the second file, "rate.pdf".(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I understand it takes that form because the usW vertex is Carribbo supressed relative to the udW vertex. My concern is that the ratio is only squared.

Rate is proportional to the amplitude *squared*. And the amplitude is proportional to the square of the coupling constant (multiplied by the propagator). So the transition rate must be proportional to the fourth power of the coupling constant, right?

Is the expression in rate.pdf wrong?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Another question on rates, propagators, etc

Loading...

Similar Threads - Another question rates | Date |
---|---|

Another question from Srednicki's QFT book | Jul 16, 2014 |

Another Higgs Boson question | Jul 13, 2012 |

Another question about beta decay (stupid ones) | Jun 3, 2008 |

Another question on antiparticles | Mar 2, 2006 |

Another nuke question | Oct 15, 2003 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**