Higgs Boson Decay Ratio: Mass or Mass Squared?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the decay ratio of the Higgs boson into a bound state of b quark and b anti-quark versus c quark and c anti-quark. Participants are exploring the relationship between the decay widths and the masses of the involved particles.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster presents differing opinions on whether the decay ratio should be based on the masses or the masses squared. They discuss the implications of Feynman diagrams and the factors of coupling in the amplitude related to the decay process.

Discussion Status

Some participants have acknowledged the confusion regarding the relationship between the decay width and the amplitude, with one noting a realization about the importance of the modulus square of the amplitude. There is an ongoing exploration of the assumptions regarding the number of vertices in the Feynman diagram.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of their differing interpretations of the decay process and the associated theoretical framework, which may involve missing information about the creation of the Higgs boson.

Barny
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the ratio of the partial widths of the decay of the Higgs boson into the bound state of b quark and b anti quark and c quark and C anti quark

Homework Equations



None

The Attempt at a Solution



Me and my friend disagree on the answer. I believe it should be the ratio of the masses of the particles and my friend believes it should be the ratio of the masses squared.

My reasoning is if you construct a Feynman diagram for this process then there is only one vertex and therefore one factor of coupling in the amplitude. The amplitude is proportional to the partial width and the mass is proportional to the coupling - therefore with everything else being constant the ratio results in the ratio of masses.

Their argument is that I'm missing a vertex from my diagram and you can't just have a Higgs boson propagate and decay without something creating it first. Hence another factor of the coupling would be introduced and by a similar argument you'd result in a ratio of mass squared.

Suffice to say were both abit confused. Any help greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
but the width is related to the modulus square of the amplitude, hence square of the masses. right?
 
Last edited:
yup, your right. Had one of those "thats what i was doing wrong" moments this morning. Cheers for your reply.
 
Barny said:
yup, your right. Had one of those "thats what i was doing wrong" moments this morning. Cheers for your reply.

that sometimes happens :-)

Now, good luck!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K