Could Antimatter Propulsion Revolutionize Space Travel?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Antimatter propulsion has the potential to revolutionize space travel by utilizing the complete conversion of matter and antimatter into energy, specifically photons. Current scientific understanding indicates that 19 grams of antimatter combined with an equal amount of matter could theoretically achieve escape velocity for a one-ton spacecraft. However, practical challenges exist, including the difficulty of producing and storing antimatter, with CERN's capabilities limited to approximately 10^-18 grams of antimatter. The discussion highlights the inefficiency of collecting positrons from radioactive decay as a viable alternative for antimatter production.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of antimatter and matter interactions
  • Knowledge of photon momentum and energy conversion
  • Familiarity with particle physics and CERN's research capabilities
  • Basic principles of propulsion systems in aerospace engineering
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the current advancements in antimatter production at CERN and other facilities
  • Explore the principles of photon propulsion and its theoretical applications
  • Investigate the challenges of antimatter storage and potential solutions
  • Study the implications of positron emission tomography (PET) in antimatter research
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, physicists, and researchers interested in advanced propulsion technologies and the future of space exploration will benefit from this discussion.

kieyard
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
hello everyone, i wasn't sure what category this should go under so General Physics was the safest bet.

to my understanding when antimatter and normal matter collides its a 100% conversion into light, is this correct?

if so, the conservation of mass says all the mass that was originally there is still there but instead of few atoms of antimatter and matter it is now millions upon billions of photons, is that also right?

if so, in the future, near or far i don;t know, could we perhaps have a controlled reaction between the two in a engine of sorts that then directs these photons in a single direction using mirrors to achieve space flight?
using the momentum equation m1v1=m2v2 if we wanted to get one ton to achieve escape velocity (11,000 m/s) we would need 19 grams of antimatter and another 19 grams of matter. because 1000(a ton in kg)*11000(escape velocity)=3*108(speed of light / speed mass will be traveling after reaction)*0.0367(amount of mass needed to balance equation)

there's definitely something I am missing, i know its hard to create and store antimatter and even harder to make something which can do what I am asking but i feel as if i would of heard something somewhere if a project like this was in development, there's got to be a reason why it isn't, any details or information on this would be great, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kieyard said:
to my understanding when antimatter and normal matter collides its a 100% conversion into light, is this correct?
Not necessarily - it depends on the type of matter and the way they meet. Proton/antiproton (or in general hadron/hadron) collisions produce muons and neutrinos as well.
kieyard said:
if so, the conservation of mass says all the mass that was originally there is still there but instead of few atoms of antimatter and matter it is now millions upon billions of photons, is that also right?
That depends on the way you define "mass".
kieyard said:
if so, in the future, near or far i don;t know, could we perhaps have a controlled reaction between the two in a engine of sorts that then directs these photons in a single direction using mirrors to achieve space flight?
There are no proper gamma ray mirrors, but something along this line could be possible, yes.

The amount of antimatter needed depends on the mass of the spacecraft .
kieyard said:
there's definitely something I am missing, i know its hard to create and store antimatter and even harder to make something which can do what I am asking but i feel as if i would of heard something somewhere if a project like this was in development, there's got to be a reason why it isn't, any details or information on this would be great, thanks.
All the antimatter created in the last decades wouldn't lift your rocket even by a centimeter. There is no realistic way to produce or store grams of antimatter in the near future. CERN experiments can store about 10-18 grams of (neutral) antimatter, that is 19 orders of magnitude below your numbers.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
iv read before that anti matter / positrons to be precise are used in medical PET and are produced by radioactive decay. what do you know of this and could we not gather it from this process rather than the LHC at CERN?
 
kieyard said:
iv read before that anti matter / positrons to be precise are used in medical PET and are produced by radioactive decay. what do you know of this and could we not gather it from this process rather than the LHC at CERN?
To expect this to be a practical solution presupposes that a suitable 'bottle' could be made that would use substantially less energy to store this antimatter until it needed to be used, than the energy available from the 'drive'. It would be along the lines of using superconductors for power transmission in the absence of room temperature superconductors.
 
Collecting positrons from radioactive decays would be possible, but even more inefficient than particle accelerator generated antimatter.
Positrons all have a positive charge - as soon as you try to store relevant amounts of them the electrostatic repulsion becomes to strong. To store larger amounts, you would need positrons and antiprotons to form neutral hydrogen. The record is somewhere in the range of 1000 atoms over less than an hour. Far away from practical amounts.

While the LHC produces antiparticles, those are not stored. The antiproton experiments at CERN use the smaller PS and SPS accelerators.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K