I have long been working on a paper and sent it in to a total of seven journals. The first two tries resulted in some feedback, and at the third try I managed to get to the peer review phase. At my last four attempts I got it back without feedback at two occasions. Once I had already sent it in to another journal from the same publisher and thus they refused to review it. Once the editor thought my article was a bit out of scope for their journal. I was happy when I got to peer review at a high-ranked journal. Later on, when I got refused without peer review from a journal that accepts a lot of bad grammar and spelling errors already in the abstract, I was not so happy. Some month ago I decided to try to get my paper to arXiv. From my education I know a guy which has several papers in the most appropriate section, general relativity and quantum cosmology, but he had uploaded to few paper in recent years to have endorsement rights. I found out that another guy that I contacted some year ago had endorsement rights at the general physics section and he was willing to endorse me. I sent my paper in on January 31 but February 25 the moderators at arXiv decided to reject my paper, even though it was endorsed. Now I have tried to appeal the moderators decision, making the argument that reaching the peer-review phase at a high-ranked journal should normally mean that the paper is good enought for arXiv and that I intend to resubmit the paper in to the, perhaps more relvant, gr-qc section once I find an endorserer. I do not have much hope for my appeal and now if feels like I am going to have to turn to viXra, a great defeat. Anyhow, does anyone have any experience dealing with the moderators at arXiv? That is, when you have a paper that is endorsed by someone but it still gets rejected by the moderators. Will the moderators ever change their opinion?