Applying conservation of momentum to find recoil of the Earth

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around applying the conservation of momentum to analyze the recoil of the Earth when a baseball bounces off a wall. The original poster presents a scenario involving a baseball with a specified mass and speed, and seeks to determine the recoil speed of the Earth, which has a significantly larger mass.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the initial and final momentum of the system, questioning the calculations and assumptions made regarding the mass of the Earth and the ball. Some participants suggest the need to consider the conservation of angular momentum due to the wall's position relative to the Earth's center of mass.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, pointing out discrepancies in the original poster's calculations and exploring different interpretations of momentum conservation. There is a recognition of the need to clarify the before and after scenarios in the momentum analysis.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note potential confusion regarding the treatment of the ball's momentum after the collision and the implications of energy conservation in the context of elastic collisions.

cherry_cat
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



We can use our results for head-on elastic collisions to analyze the recoil of the Earth when a ball bounces off a wall embedded in the Earth. Suppose a professional baseball pitcher hurls a baseball (m = 160 grams) with a speed (v1 = 44 m/s) at a wall, and the ball bounces back with little loss of kinetic energy. What is the recoil speed of the Earth (M = 6e24 kg)?

Homework Equations



v=sqrt(2gh)
p=mv
p(total)=m1v1+m2v2
v=p/m

The Attempt at a Solution



M(Earth)=6e24 kg
M(Ball)=0.16 kg

P(Ball) = 0.16*44 kg m/s = 7.04 kg.m/s
The momentum must be the same before and after the collision. Therefore, the momentum provided to the Earth when the ball hits is 6.82 kg.m/s

v(Earth) = P(total)/M(Earth+ball)
v(Earth)=7.04/ 6e24
v(Earth)=1.173e-24

I was sure all my working was correct, but the answer is wrong. Is there anything I have missed?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
My immediate thought was that the ball is bouncing off a wall some distance from the center of mass of the Earth ... so you are really interested in conservation of angular momentum.

However - looking at your relations, why did you add the mass of the ball to the mass of the Earth?

The way to do these problems is to sketch the "before" and "after" situations - so you know what you are describing. Then, write out the momentum calculations separately. Then put before=after.

From what you've done, your "before" should be a stationary Earth and a moving ball.
What would the "after" be?
 
cherry_cat said:
P(Ball) = 0.16*44 kg m/s = 7.04 kg.m/s
The momentum must be the same before and after the collision.
It isn't the same - the ball is going the other way.
Therefore, the momentum provided to the Earth when the ball hits is 6.82 kg.m/s
I have no idea where you get that number from.
 
The before section would be m1v1 = 0.16*44 = 7.04 kg.m/s as the ball is traveling towards the wall

After the ball hits the wall, it would have negative momentum but assuming no loss in kinetic energy, wouldn't it have a negative momentum of 7.04 kg.m/s and the Earth would have two times the momentum that the ball originally has. or -m1v1+2m1v1
 
cherry_cat said:
The before section would be m1v1 = 0.16*44 = 7.04 kg.m/s as the ball is traveling towards the wall

After the ball hits the wall, it would have negative momentum but assuming no loss in kinetic energy, wouldn't it have a negative momentum of 7.04 kg.m/s and the Earth would have two times the momentum that the ball originally has. or -m1v1+2m1v1
Yes, but that would be 14.08 kg.m/s, not 6.82.
 
Yes the momentum would have to be constant before and after the collision, so it would be 7.04 kg.m/s, meaning 2*p would be 14.08 kg.m/s

Which means you could set the after section, of m1v1+m2v2=7.04
And because the ball lost no energy, it would be -7.04+m2v2=7.04
So m2v2=14.08
v2=14.08/6e24
v2=2.35e-24

Is that logical?
 
haruspex said:
Yes, but that would be 14.08 kg.m/s, not 6.82.

That's true. I must have made a foolish mistake somewhere. Thanks for pointing it out, I'm new to physics and sometimes I make mistakes and don't notice. I will try to be more careful.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
335
Views
17K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K