Arctan Identities Via Exponentiation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter 4dhayman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    identities
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving arctan identities through complex exponentiation, specifically the angle addition formula: $$\arctan{(a)}+\arctan{(b)}= \arctan{\left(\dfrac{a+b}{1-ab}\right)}$$. The argument presented involves equating complex exponentials but is only valid under the condition that ##ab<1##. The relationship between the arctangent function and the complex logarithm is acknowledged, emphasizing the need to consider the complexities of the Riemann surface when applying these identities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of arctangent identities and their properties
  • Familiarity with complex exponentiation and Euler's formula
  • Knowledge of Riemann surfaces and complex logarithms
  • Basic skills in mathematical proof techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the arctan angle addition formula in detail
  • Explore the implications of complex exponentiation in trigonometric identities
  • Research Riemann surfaces and their relevance to complex functions
  • Examine the properties of the complex logarithm and its branches
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of complex analysis, and anyone interested in advanced trigonometric identities and their proofs.

4dhayman
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to prove identities involving arctan by complex exponentiation?

I had in mind something like the following for the arctan angle addition formula, but I feel there is something not quite right in the argument.

$$\arctan{(a)}+\arctan{(b)}= \arctan{\left(\dfrac{a+b}{1-ab}\right)} \implies e^{i\left(\arctan{(a)}+\arctan{(b)}\right)}=e^{i \arctan{\left(\frac{a+b}{1-ab}\right)}} \implies (ai+1)(bi+1) \propto ((a+b)i+(1-ab)) \implies True$$

Is this argument valid? If not, can it be modified to make it correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your formula is only valid for ##ab<1##. And yes, the arcus tangent function is related to the complex logarithm but one has to take care of the complex area for which equations hold, because the complex logarithm splits into a Riemann surface.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K