Are anyons possible in higher dimensions?

Click For Summary
In higher dimensions, particles are classified as either bosons or fermions due to their indistinguishability, as established by Weinberg. However, in two-dimensional space, anyons can exist because their trajectories can wrap around each other, making them distinguishable. The discussion raises the possibility of anyons in 3D space if it possesses nontrivial topology, such as wormholes or loops, which could allow for distinguishability. This concept has been explored by researchers like Teo and Kane, focusing on Majorana Fermions and Non-Abelian Statistics in three dimensions. The potential for anyons in higher dimensions remains an open question in theoretical physics.
haael
Messages
537
Reaction score
35
Weinberg wrote that in 3D and higher spaces all particles must be bosons or fermions. The proof used the fact that particles are really indistinguishable i.e. we can't "mark" any particle and the mathematical replacement of two particles of the same type should not change any physical observable.

Yet in 2D space there anyons are possible. The particles' trajectories can nontrivially wrap over themselves and thus they are distinguishable. A particle spacetime history is its "mark". This is possible only in 2D space, since in higher dimensions all trajectories are topologically equivalent.

Now what if 3D space had some nontrivial topology? I.e. there is a wormhole or there is some elementary string or loop that particles can wrap around. This would give us the necessary topological mark so the proof does not pass.

Does anyone know if anyons can exist in higher-dimensional spaces with nontrivial topology?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.15143 The paper claims: We compare the standard homogeneous cosmological model, i.e., spatially flat ΛCDM, and the timescape cosmology which invokes backreaction of inhomogeneities. Timescape, while statistically homogeneous and isotropic, departs from average Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker evolution, and replaces dark energy by kinetic gravitational energy and its gradients, in explaining...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
892
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
11K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K