B Are colors in astro photos 'real'?

AI Thread Summary
Astrophotography often showcases vibrant colors in nebulae, but these hues may not reflect what the human eye would perceive if viewing them directly. While many images represent true colors from broad-spectrum visible light, some utilize false colors from narrow-band imaging in infrared or ultraviolet wavelengths. Long exposure times in astrophotography allow for capturing details and colors that are otherwise invisible to the naked eye, which typically sees celestial objects as shades of grey. Additionally, diffraction spikes seen in some images are genuine optical artifacts caused by telescope construction rather than digital enhancements. Overall, the colors in astro photos can be both real and artificially enhanced, depending on the imaging technique used.
Cyberspace
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
There are lots of amazing photographs of nebula around. The colors contribute greatly to their grandeur.
But if we were able to get near enough to a nebula to see it with the naked eye would it possesses the colors we see in published photographs taken by telescopes? Or are the colors in astro photos in some way artificial or exaggerated?

Similarly I note that some astro photos show effects similar to a photographers starlight filter - have these shafts of light been added for dramatic effect in digital post-processing (eg photoshop) or are they genuine artifacts, eg of the telescope optics?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Cyberspace said:
There are lots of amazing photographs of nebula around. The colors contribute greatly to their grandeur.
But if we were able to get near enough to a nebula to see it with the naked eye would it possesses the colors we see in published photographs taken by telescopes? Or are the colors in astro photos in some way artificial or exaggerated?
This depends greatly on the photo you're looking at, but in general the colours tend to be real - in the sense that they're not artificially added or altered (but not always, specifically in case of photos made in non-visible light, where the input has to be translated into visible output).
However, the exposure times are long, which means that you'll never see with a human eye the colours that you see on the photos. There's just not enough light reaching your unaided eye to activate the colour-sensitive cones, even when standing smack in the middle of a galaxy - best you can see of the Milky Way is a fuzzy grey band (its grey because rods in the eye are more sensitive to light, but perceive everything in the shades of grey).

Cyberspace said:
Similarly I note that some astro photos show effects similar to a photographers starlight filter - have these shafts of light been added for dramatic effect in digital post-processing (eg photoshop) or are they genuine artifacts, eg of the telescope optics?
Those are diffraction spikes due to telescope construction. Mostly caused by the struts holding the secondary mirror in e.g. Newtonian-type telescopes.
 
  • Like
Likes Imager, russ_watters, davenn and 2 others
The short is yes, the long answer is sort of. Here is an explanation: http://hubblesite.org/gallery/behind_the_pictures/meaning_of_color/
 
  • Like
Likes Jeannie O, Cyberspace and 1oldman2
Bandersnatch - thanks for that very informative reply, answered my questions perfectly.
newjerseyrunner - thanks for the link, very useful too.

Cheers
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2 and newjerseyrunner
There was a long thread on exactly that some time back if you feel like a forum search
 
Cyberspace said:
There are lots of amazing photographs of nebula around. The colors contribute greatly to their grandeur.
But if we were able to get near enough to a nebula to see it with the naked eye would it possesses the colors we see in published photographs taken by telescopes? Or are the colors in astro photos in some way artificial or exaggerated?

If they are board spectrum visible light images, then they are likely true colour
eg this photo of the great Orion Nebula of mine ...

upload_2016-8-21_18-7-18.png
narrow band imaging in various wavelengths tend to be false colour eg this IR image of the Orion Nebula ...

m42-43_2m.jpg
Dave
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2 and phinds
It's generally a good idea to inform yourself about the whole range of the electromagnetic spectrum that telescopes can capture, which is much wider than what a human eye can see. Anything above or below the range of visible light wavelength (400-780 nanometres) is invisible to the naked eye.

Many space photographs employ false colors in IR or UV photos. We wouldn't be able to see those objects through the naked eye.

It's also important to take into account how many light/years they are away from us. Today, the furthest ones don't look like the light that reaches us or don't exist anymore.
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2
davenn said:
this photo of the great Orion Nebula of mine ...
:thumbup::smile: How many stacks is this image made from ?
 
For one of my favorite photos I added the diffraction spikes by adding wires across the front of my scope (which doesn't have struts). It is basically a natural color image (I used hydrogen alpha for red).

Horsehead-HaRGB.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes davenn and 1oldman2
  • #10
1oldman2 said:
:thumbup::smile: How many stacks is this image made from ?

15 from memory
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2
  • #11
russ_watters said:
For one of my favorite photos I added the diffraction spikes by adding wires across the front of my scope (which doesn't have struts). It is basically a natural color image (I used hydrogen alpha for red).

sweet shot, Russ ... I have imaged that region but not as well as you
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2 and russ_watters

Similar threads

Back
Top