B Are electromagnetic wavelength and quantum wavelength the same thing?

Jehannum
Messages
102
Reaction score
26
TL;DR Summary
A simple enough question not to need a summary - I hope
The classical picture of the electromagnetic wave has electric and magnetic field oscillations which give the wavelength of the light. In the quantum picture, is the wavelength of the (de Broglie) wave function of the photon the same thing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes.
 
Is it suprising that something normally taken to be non physical (the wavefunction regarded as a probability amplitude) has a physical manifestation (electric / magnetic field oscillations)? What's the deeper reason behind this? Are there any other instances where classical and quantum are the same in this way?
 
Matter waves have no magnetic and electric fields so no. They are not the same thing as electromagnetic waves.
Matter waves are inferred whereas electromagnetic waves can be and are measured directly.
 
I think you are reading too much into this. Are electromagnetic wavelength and water wavelength the same thing?
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top