Are Electrons & Protons Oriented in Stars Like Other Objects?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PhDnotForMe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms Sun The sun
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the orientation and behavior of electrons and protons in stars, particularly in the context of the Sun's composition and stellar evolution. Participants explore the nature of plasma in stars, the processes of nuclear fusion, and the lifecycle of different types of stars.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether electrons in the Sun are organized around nuclei like in ordinary matter, or if they exist in a more chaotic state due to the extreme conditions of a star.
  • It is noted that the Sun is primarily a plasma, and thus traditional atomic structures may not apply as they do in cooler, denser matter.
  • One participant asserts that the Sun will never produce iron due to its insufficient mass, while another expresses confusion about the role of iron in stellar evolution and supernovae.
  • There is a discussion about the different ways stars can end their life cycles, including the transition to white dwarfs for smaller stars and supernovae for more massive stars.
  • Some participants mention that the photosphere of the Sun contains hydrogen and other elements, which contribute to its spectral lines.
  • One participant suggests that the creation of elements in stars progresses up the periodic table, depending on the star's mass and core pressure, leading to a discussion about the conditions required for iron production.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of atomic structure in the Sun and the processes involved in stellar evolution. There is no consensus on whether the Sun can produce iron or the specifics of how stars evolve based on their mass.

Contextual Notes

Some claims about stellar processes depend on the definitions of terms like "atom" in the context of plasma physics. Additionally, the discussion includes unresolved questions about the lifecycle of stars and the conditions required for supernovae.

PhDnotForMe
Messages
56
Reaction score
3
So the sun is largely hydrogen atoms and those hydrogen atoms are undergoing fusion all the way up until they reach iron. My question is are the electrons orbiting around the nucleus just as they are in any normal object? Or is the sun just like a pool of electrons and protons floating around with no predictable order in regards to the relation between electrons and protons?
Basically what is the orientation of electrons and protons within objects as hot and dense as stars.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The Sun is a big ball of plasma. There are no atoms in it, in the sense of electrons connected with a particular nucleus.

By the way, the Sun will never end up producing iron. It is not big enough for that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Keith_McClary, davenn, stefan r and 1 other person
DrClaude said:
The Sun is a big ball of plasma. There are no atoms in it, in the sense of electrons connected with a particular nucleus.

By the way, the Sun will never end up producing iron. It is not big enough for that.
Interesting! Thanks. I just looked into what you said about iron. It checks out! Interestingly enough there is in fact Iron within the sun but apparently that is from previous stars. The sun doesn't create it and I guess it never will? I was under the impression that super novas were caused by stars only creating iron and getting no return on energy and thus creating a cooling effect that expands the star into an explosion. I know our star is predicted to die at some point. Can you help me connect some dots? I feel like I'm missing something. Can stars explode before reaching the creation of iron stage?
 
Going supernova is not the only way for a star to die. Smaller stars essentially die by no longer being able to sustain fusion and gradually fade away to become white dwarves.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDnotForMe
The photosphere of the sun does have hydrogen and other atoms which give rise to the absorption lines in the solar spectrum.
Regards Andrew
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Keith_McClary and PhDnotForMe
PhDnotForMe said:
Interesting! Thanks. I just looked into what you said about iron. It checks out! Interestingly enough there is in fact Iron within the sun but apparently that is from previous stars. The sun doesn't create it and I guess it never will? I was under the impression that super novas were caused by stars only creating iron and getting no return on energy and thus creating a cooling effect that expands the star into an explosion. I know our star is predicted to die at some point. Can you help me connect some dots? I feel like I'm missing something. Can stars explode before reaching the creation of iron stage?
How star evolve depends on their mass. Large massive stars can end as supernovae. Stars like our Sun expand into red giants, Then later will blow off some of its mass before shrinking to a white dwarf. Stars much less massive than or Sun like Red dwarfs, will burn pretty much steadily for trillions of years before finally exhausting their fuel and settling into a white dwarf stage.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDnotForMe
Wikipedia's article on stellar evolution is good IMO. If you want something better you should probably get an astronomy textbook and just dig in. Also see articles on main sequence, evolution of the solar system, the Sun, red giant branch, and asymptotic branch, and white dwarf.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: Keith_McClary and PhDnotForMe
FYI: A.G.W. Cameron's updated and revised text: "Stellar Evolution, Nuclear Astrophysics, and Nucleogenesis" is still available on Amazon.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDnotForMe
andrew s 1905 said:
The photosphere of the sun does have hydrogen and other atoms which give rise to the absorption lines in the solar spectrum.
Regards Andrew
It is mainly neutral atoms, in fact. Just 0.04% of the hydrogen atoms are ionized at an optical depth of 1. For helium that fraction should be much smaller.
Bilderberg model
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: stefan r and andrew s 1905
  • #10
I'm not an expert / scientist but as I understand it the elements created go up the periodic table. From hydrogen, to helium and the rest depends on the mass of the star. If the star has sufficient mass, i.e. is has sufficient pressure in it's core, it can go on to produce heavier and heavier elements until the pressures it can produce can no longer sustain fusion at that stage and begin to die and become a red giant.

Only the biggest stars have sufficients mass / pressure in their core to go on producing heavier and heavier elements until they start producing iron and then go supernova at that point. The vast majority of stars are not big enough to get to this phase though. Our sun is not big enough and will never produce any iron.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K