Are Flat, Coplanar Orbits Only Found in Spiral Galaxies?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Sastronaut
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Big bang Orbits Star
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 3K views
Sastronaut
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
Hey PF! Have two questions here for everyone. Recently had a professor define the The Big Bang as "the expansion and cooling of the universe from an originally hot and dense state", but is this correct? To me it sounded more like the description of cosmic inflation...thoughts?

Additionally, was recently reading about galaxy types and star orbits. Which types of galaxies do you think astronomers would find stars that orbit in flat, coplanar orbits? My thought is solely spiral galaxies, but is that right? Do irregular or elliptical contain stars that orbit in such a manor? I didn't think irregular because i thought orbits would be all over place since irregular galaxies are created through collisions or galaxy's interacting and the resulting gravitation interaction would skew star orbits.


Thanks PF
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
That is an excellent description of the big bang, which is indeed a theory that describes the evolution of the universe as an expansion from a hot dense state. Why do you think it is not?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Because i have read that the (rapid) expansion of the universe is a descriptive for inflation and i have also seen the big bang theory defined simply as the instantaneous expansion of space and time...
 
Sastronaut said:
Because i have read that the (rapid) expansion of the universe is a descriptive for inflation and i have also seen the big bang theory defined simply as the instantaneous expansion of space and time...

Any description that says it was an instantaneous expansion is utterly wrong

Inflation is a hypothesized PART of the expansion from a hot dense state. It occurred (IF it occurred) in a very tiny fraction of a second, a tiny fraction of a second after the singularity, and caused an unbelievably massive expansion of the universe. By human standards this would have been for all practical purposes "instantaneous" however, as a scientific description of what happened, "instantaneous" is nonsense.

Inflation is not proven but it explains more than any other theory about the characteristics of the very early part of the expansion.
 
Phinds thank you for your help that makes much more sense now!