Are High Z SNe Brighter than LCMD Predicts?

  • Thread starter RCopernicus
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation touches on the topic of supernovae and their brightness in relation to their redshift. Some articles from 2009 were mentioned and there was a question posed about any studies showing a discrepancy between the predicted brightness and actual brightness of supernovae with high redshift. It was mentioned that some rare events may appear brighter, but overall, the majority of supernovae align with the expected relationship.
  • #1
RCopernicus
23
1
I've read one or two articles that are a little dated (2009) and having some trouble finding a thread that discussed the matter briefly. I know that SN US02Wil is bright (for its distance). Is anyone aware of any studies that show that SNe with a high Z appear to be brighter than LCDM predicts?
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
No.

There are some rare events that look way too bright, but there's no systematic tendency. The vast majority of supernovae fall in line with the expected redshift-brightness relationship, and those few that don't can generally be explained as not actually being SN-1A events, or as due to chance alignments.
 

1. What is the significance of High Z SNe in astrophysics research?

High Z SNe, or high redshift supernovae, are important in astrophysics research because they are among the most distant and oldest objects in the universe that we can observe. They can provide valuable information about the early universe and its evolution, as well as the nature of dark energy.

2. What is LCMD and how does it relate to High Z SNe brightness?

LCMD stands for the "Luminosity-Corrected Mean Delay Time" and is a method used to predict the brightness of supernovae. This method takes into account the average delay time between the formation of a star and its eventual explosion as a supernova. High Z SNe are often used to test the accuracy of this prediction method.

3. Are High Z SNe always brighter than what LCMD predicts?

No, not necessarily. While High Z SNe are often found to be brighter than the LCMD prediction, there have been cases where they have been dimmer or in line with the prediction. The relationship between High Z SNe brightness and LCMD prediction is still being studied and understood.

4. What could be causing the discrepancy between High Z SNe brightness and LCMD prediction?

There are several potential factors that could contribute to the difference between High Z SNe brightness and LCMD prediction. These include variations in the composition and properties of the supernova itself, as well as uncertainties in the distance measurements and other observational factors.

5. How do scientists account for this discrepancy in their research?

Scientists are constantly working to improve and refine their understanding of supernovae and their prediction methods. This includes studying and analyzing data from High Z SNe, as well as conducting experiments and simulations to better understand the underlying physics and processes involved in supernova explosions. By continuously improving their methods, scientists hope to better account for the discrepancy and make more accurate predictions in the future.

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Cosmology
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
8
Views
954
Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top