Are many Physics Students entering into Astrophysics?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the increasing interest among physics students in pursuing Astrophysics and related fields, exploring potential reasons for this trend, including influences from popular science media and recent scientific advancements. Participants share personal observations and experiences regarding the motivations behind this interest, as well as the implications of such a trend on the broader physics community.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note a perceived increase in students pursuing Astrophysics, attributing it to popular science influences and recent advancements in the field.
  • Others argue that anecdotal observations are subjective and caution against drawing conclusions without more objective data.
  • One participant mentions the impact of the James Webb telescope and media coverage of astrophysical discoveries as factors driving interest in the field.
  • Another points out the significance of gravitational wave detection and the ongoing challenges in cosmology, suggesting these scientific developments may attract students.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the motivations behind this trend, suggesting that many students may not have explored other physics subfields thoroughly.
  • A discussion emerges regarding the potential for "make-work" jobs in academia and how this might relate to the influx of students into Astrophysics.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of a focus on Astrophysics at the expense of other important areas in physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the reasons behind the trend of students entering Astrophysics. While some see it as a positive development influenced by recent scientific achievements, others question the motivations and the adequacy of students' exposure to other fields of physics.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the lack of undergraduate research exposure in certain contexts, which may influence students' decisions to pursue Astrophysics without exploring other specializations.

warhammer
Messages
164
Reaction score
33
Maybe it is my present circle but I see a lot of students pursuing Astrophysics and related domains in terms of projects, Master's Degree etc. and I wonder what are the reasons for the same.

Is the field extremely "hot" or is it just saturation caused by excessive Pop Sci influence?

Full disclosure - Even I was fascinated by Astrophysics based on my exposure to Pop Sci during my High School. However I noticed a shift from my University Days when I realised I appreciated other fields equally well (reading about them in a sense gave me intellectual orgasms to say the least!).

While that appetite for Astrophysics is certainly there, I do not want to commit to any particular specialisation right now. To be fair, I feel a lot of those Astrophysics pursuants haven't really explored other Physical branches and are simply playing on their hunches - fascinations based on Pop Sci. Which is not bad per se, but it is often said and remarked that there is whole lot of distinction between that and "real, hard science" that actually goes on into that.

This is not particularly a post asking for guidance, but maybe to stoke a discussion. But if you are older and more experienced than me, feel free to drop your guiding thoughts!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
warhammer said:
Maybe it is my present circle but I see a lot of students pursuing Astrophysics and related domains in terms of projects, Master's Degree etc. and ...
That's a highly subjective "data point". I think before trying to draw conclusions about a data point, you should work more towards validating the data.
 
phinds said:
That's a highly subjective "data point". I think before trying to draw conclusions about a data point, you should work more towards validating the data.
To be honest, the post is not that objective in the true sense. As mentioned explicitly it is meant to stoke discussion. 'Maybe' & 'Present Circle' itself lend anecdotal nature to it.

I wanted to change the heading more appropriately lest someone else also think I am inferring ill drawn conclusions but the character limit wouldn't let me do that. So I amply described it in the post.
 
Your subject line presupposes a conclusion. "So many physics students are entering into Astrophysics" but I see what you mean about the character limit in the title.

EDIT: At any rate, I think we've beat that horse to death and now if anyone has anything to contribute other than my nitpicking, the thread can continue :smile:
 
phinds said:
Your subject line presupposes a conclusion. "So many physics students are entering into Astrophysics" but I see what you mean about the character limit in the title.

EDIT: At any rate, I think we've beat that horse to death and now if anyone has anything to contribute other than my nitpicking, the thread can continue :smile:
Edited the title 😁
 
My anecdotal observation from perusing social media sites (i.e. the Reddit Graduate Admissions forum, my local Reddit Undergraduate Admissions forum, and GradCafe ) is that there does indeed seem to be an uptick in interest in Cosmology and Astrophysics programs. I attribute it to the increased incidence of reporting in the news and in popular media of astrophysical discoveries that have arisen from the James Webb telescope in particular. There's also hype from Space X and other space startups that are generating interest in "space sciences" amongst prospective undergrads and grad students.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: warhammer
I think there are also some science-driven reasons in going into astrophysics/cosmology right now. One is that an entire new window has been opened by the detection of gravitational waves, and we are only at the beginning with that but already some very promising results, including the observation of a kilonova in both gravitational-wave and various frequency ranges of electromagnetic signals ("multi-messenger astronomy"). Then there's of course also the James Webb space telescope in operation. In cosmlogy there's kind of a new crisis in consolidating the Hubble-constant tension.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: warhammer
I think that as we become a ChatGPT nation (or world, or whatever), there will be an increasing political push for make-work jobs - not because they contribute to the economy, but because folks are going to be getting a lot of welfare, and everyone wants everyone else to put in "an honest day's work" to get it. An easy way to achieve this is to let intellectuals (who are the most dangerous class of folks to have unemployed, with respect to political stability) have an intellectual career, and astronomy fits the bill as well as any liberal art discipline would. Finding life on other worlds is an existential desire for all sentient beings, and thus astronomers will be able to fill this niche in the make-work universe (pun intended).
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: Frabjous
So you really think you can shoehorn "intellectuals" into being astronomers???

I agree w/ you that most folks want an honest days work but I think the rest of your post is out of touch with reality.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Frabjous
  • #10
phinds said:
So you really think you can shoehorn "intellectuals" into being astronomers???

I agree w/ you that most folks want an honest days work but I think the rest of your post is out of touch with reality.
How so? Do you not think that ChatGPT is going to be a sledgehammer whacking away at professional careers? If you agree with the Sledgehammer Principle, then do you not agree that there will be a political impetus for make-work? Please elucidate!
 
  • #11
How would you like to have a pointless "make-work" job?
 
  • #12
phinds said:
How would you like to have a pointless "make-work" job?
If that is what the economic paradigm dictates, I will do it. The beauty of a make-work job is that since it is make-work, there will not be any impetus for the work to be stressful, and there will be a lot of leeway for folks to choose a field that they really have a passion for (and as well be able to move into another field later if their passion changes). While this will be a paradigm in which intellectuals will find proper agency, I admit that it will be more difficult for non-intellectuals, be they white-collar or blue-collar. I really think that fixing the carbon problem and the "end of work" will be the main (non-political) problems to be worked in the 21st Century.
 
  • #13
gwnorth said:
My anecdotal observation from perusing social media sites (i.e. the Reddit Graduate Admissions forum, my local Reddit Undergraduate Admissions forum, and GradCafe ) is that there does indeed seem to be an uptick in interest in Cosmology and Astrophysics programs. I attribute it to the increased incidence of reporting in the news and in popular media of astrophysical discoveries that have arisen from the James Webb telescope in particular. There's also hype from Space X and other space startups that are generating interest in "space sciences" amongst prospective undergrads and grad students.
Interestingly I was having a chat with my Professor and he was referring to the same. To be fair I belong to a country where undergrad exposure to research is EXTREMELY low, negligible almost. So particularly in my context, it is surprising to see a big chunk of physics grads going for it when they haven't even 'tasted' other specialisations. I suspect they are purely motivated through the PopSci content and the hype you mentioned.

For full disclosure, I too was gung ho over Astrophysics, Cosmology et al as we journeyed from HS to university, of course because the mind was fermented with the comprehensible (and popular) debates, videos amongst the populariser group (Tyson, Kaku, Greene etc). Once I had my own exposure, that interest still remains but now I am in a position where I find other sub-fields equally interesting such as in CMP and in QFTs too (I'm yet to decide on a specialisation/problem).

Of course not projecting my own journey but to me it seems a lot of my peers are in a silo because I do know for a certainty that they do not have the exposure equivalent to mine (remarked with full humility), atleast a notable chunk!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gwnorth

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
14K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K