Are MECOs the Solution to Galactic Black Hole Mysteries?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Nereid
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the viability of Magnetospheric Eternally Collapsing Objects (MECOs) as a solution to the mysteries surrounding galactic black hole candidates (GBHC). Participants express skepticism regarding the observational data supporting MECO models and question the credibility of the related publications, particularly concerning peer review. The conversation references several papers and abstracts from the American Physical Society and arXiv, highlighting inconsistencies and errors in the MECO model's theoretical framework. Overall, the community remains cautious about the acceptance of MECOs in explaining GBHC phenomena.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity and Einstein field equations
  • Familiarity with galactic black hole candidates (GBHC)
  • Knowledge of the Magnetospheric Eternally Collapsing Object (MECO) model
  • Experience with academic publishing and peer review processes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of General Relativity on black hole theories
  • Examine observational data related to galactic black hole candidates
  • Study the Magnetospheric Eternally Collapsing Object (MECO) model in detail
  • Investigate the peer review process in astrophysical journals
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and researchers interested in black hole phenomena, as well as students studying General Relativity and its applications in modern astrophysics.

Nereid
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
3,397
Reaction score
3
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006astro.ph..2453R".

From the abstract:
We show that the existence of intrinsically magnetic GBHC [galactic black hole candidates] is consistent with a new class of solutions of the Einstein field equations of General Relativity.
I suppose I should start a thread in the Relativity section, re how well the "new class of solutions of the Einstein field equations of General Relativity" holds water; here I'm interested in looking at how well the observational data matches MECO models.

Thoughts?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I've posted a brief comment on this paper in the GR forum. Basically, I'm not particuarly impressed with it, there appears to be some elementary errors. Unfortunately I cannot comment on the astronomical observation aspects.

Do you know if the journal this was published in was peer-reviewed?
 
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001APS..APRJ14014R" gives: "American Physical Society, April Meeting, April 28 - May 1, 2001 Washington, DC Bulletin of the American Physical Society, Vol. 46, No. 2, abstract #J14.014" (the title is slightly different).

or, still from http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004APS..APR.B8008L": "American Physical Society, April Meeting, 2004, May 1-4, 2004, Denver, Colorado April 2004, MEETING ID: APR04, abstract #B8.008" (the title is the same, but the abstract different).

There are, apparently, two preprints http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0307438" .

[Edit: from http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/0505/0505518.pdf" (p2 Introduction):
Finally a full discussion of the entire observational and theoretical program for the ”Magnetospheric Eternally Collapsing Object (MECO) model of Galactic Black Hole Candidates and Active Galactic Nuclei” was published (Robertson and Leiter 2005) as chapter one in the book ”New Directions in Black Hole Research” recently published by Nova Science Publishers.
Looks like they're having some difficulty getting published, e.g. in ApJ.]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
12K