Stellar-mass black hole formation sequence

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the formation sequence of stellar-mass black holes, particularly the uncertainty surrounding whether a massive star's iron core collapses first into an unstable neutron star before forming a black hole, or if it collapses directly into a black hole. A significant mass gap exists between the largest neutron stars, approximately 3 M☉, and the smallest observed stellar-mass black holes, around 5 M☉. The conversation explores the implications of an exponential increase in density during collapse, suggesting that a minimum-mass black hole could form at the center before a conventional black hole emerges. This speculation raises questions about the collapse process and the nature of black hole quantization.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity (GR)
  • Familiarity with Stellar Evolution and Supernova Mechanics
  • Knowledge of Neutron Star Physics
  • Basic concepts of Quantum Gravity and Hawking Radiation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the collapse mechanisms of massive stars and their transition to black holes
  • Study the properties and formation processes of neutron stars and their mass limits
  • Explore theories surrounding black hole quantization and minimum mass thresholds
  • Investigate the implications of Hawking radiation in non-vacuum conditions
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students of physics interested in the complexities of black hole formation and the unresolved questions surrounding stellar evolution and mass limits.

  • #31
sevenperforce said:
You don't have to have a region of empty space per se; it can simply be a region of lower density.

I suggest taking some time to work out the math. It isn't as simple as you are assuming it is.

(As I note below, there is no known analytical solution to the differential equations for the case of nonzero pressure; but you can still look at the equations themselves and work out some qualitative features.)

sevenperforce said:
Is there some aspect of the Oppenheimer-Snyder model which would prevent the core collapse from "outrunning" the collapse of the rest of the star?

Yes; but that aspect is that the O-S model assumes zero pressure, so it eliminates the only possible thing that could slow down the collapse of any part of the star.

AFAIK there is no analytical solution for the case of nonzero pressure, so the only way to study that case would be to do so numerically. I know such numerical simulations have been done, but unfortunately I'm not familiar enough with the numerical relativity literature to be able to point to specific results.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
11K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K