Are microcanonical algorithms still used in lattice QCD?

  • #1
533
37
I stumbled across a paper which stated that the relation between statistical mechanics and field theory is exploited to recast lattice QCD in terms of a "microcanonical ensemble" of sorts. I was curious to know if this was still a commonly used technique.

The paper in question:
http://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.613
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
1,006
105
The standard way of doing lattice QCD calculations is to exploit the relation between statistical mechanics to express QCD expectation values as expectation values in a canonical ensemble. The paper is modifying this to use a microcanonical ensemble instead of a canonical one. AFAIK the modified technique described in the paper has never been widely used. I suspect it has some disadvantages compared to the usual method. For example the canonical ensemble technique is tolerant to the fact that errors in the numerical integration of the equations of motion produce small violations of energy conservation. But these errors seem harder to deal with in a microcanonical approach.
 
  • #3
533
37
Is there something profound about this isomorphism, or is just a convenient coincidence?
 

Related Threads on Are microcanonical algorithms still used in lattice QCD?

  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
774
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
956
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Top