Are Scalar Electromagnetics a Revolutionary Energy Source or Just Pseudoscience?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the validity and potential of scalar electromagnetics as an energy source, exploring claims about energy extraction from the vacuum of space and the theoretical underpinnings of such concepts. Participants examine the implications of these ideas, including their scientific credibility and potential applications, while also considering the historical context of scalar electromagnetics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the reality of scalar electromagnetics, referencing claims about extracting energy from the vacuum and citing Tom Bearden's assertions about enormous EM energy flows.
  • Another participant suggests that the development of scalar electromagnetics by the Soviets in the mid-50s indicates a serious scientific endeavor, mentioning concepts like unified EM/gravity field theory and electrogravitation.
  • Several participants express skepticism, labeling the ideas as potentially pseudoscientific or indicative of mental health issues, comparing them to fringe theories such as those proposed by David Icke.
  • There is a general tone of disbelief regarding the legitimacy of scalar electromagnetics, with some participants categorizing it as "crank" science.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants largely disagree on the credibility of scalar electromagnetics, with some viewing it as a serious topic worthy of discussion and others dismissing it as pseudoscience or fringe theory. No consensus is reached on its validity.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects a range of opinions on the scientific basis of scalar electromagnetics, with participants expressing varying degrees of skepticism and belief. The references to historical claims and figures introduce additional complexity, but the overall scientific merit remains unresolved.

H0T_S0UP
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Are they real are what? I've read in various places on the internet that there is a vast amount of energy stored in the vacuum of space that is supposedly extractable and extremely efficient.
Longitudinal EM energy fills vacuum of space, the time domain of spacetime, time as compressed energy, E=tc2, waves of time, phase conjugate wave pairs.

"At any point and at any time, one can freely and inexpensively extract enormous EM energy flows directly from the active vacuum itself." - Tom Bearden

The top link below contains quite a bit on information about the potential weapons (scalar howitzer if anyone has heard of it) built using scalar EM waves while the link below is the main page which contains a massive amount of information.

Given that there is so much information about the subject I was just curious to see what a bunch of physicists think. Are scalar electromagnetic pure BS or does it hold some truth?


http://www.cheniere.org/books/analysis/history.htm
http://www.cheniere.org/toc.html
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By the mid-50s, the Soviets should have been well along in prototype building, weaponizing, and development of larger devices and starting new weapons, based on what I have called scalar electromagnetics— unified EM/gravity field theory a la Whittaker or simply electrogravitation using negative energy and time-reversed EM waves.
This guy must have some serious mental health issues. This is right up there with David Icke's "theory" about a secret world government controlled by shape-shifting alien lizards.
 
This is very likely a crank.
 
Fredrik said:
This guy must have some serious mental health issues. This is right up there with David Icke's "theory" about a secret world government controlled by shape-shifting alien lizards.
What the hell?! Thats just sad.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
9K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
9K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K