Are theoretical scientists blinded by scifi?

  • Thread starter nonlocal
  • Start date
  • #1
8
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

I didn't know where to post, but it's kind of a "Hmmm" question so I took a chance of posting this in the philosophy section, if a better section for this question exist on this forum I hope admins move it there.

My question is: you feel theorethical scientists might be blinded by their interest in scifi?
It seems more and more crazy theories and speculations are being studied as "real" science without any evidence pointing towards it.
String theory, many worlds interpretation, virtual realities, simulated consciousness, wormholes, time travel etc.
I know sometimes speculative science is the seed of a good scifi story, but it seems some famous physicist really buy into a lot of these HIGHLY speculative hypothesises.

You think some might be a little blinded by their scifi theories and let it get in the way of REAL science?

share your views:)
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
cristo
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
8,107
72
Are theoretical physicists blinded by scifi? NO!

Does the popular science watering down of such theories give the impression that theoretical physicists are blinded by scifi? Yes, probably.
 
  • #3
Alfi
Oh I hope so and I hope they continue to be.

SciFi is good brain food.
 
  • #4
I remember from a previous thread in GD that many of the members here seemed to really dislike the more fantastic SciFi and prefered HardSciFi, the harder the better (like they were ordering whiskey in a dirty glass or something ;-p).
 
  • #5
cristo
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
8,107
72
Since the OP's gone, I see no need to keep this thread open.
 

Related Threads for: Are theoretical scientists blinded by scifi?

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
32
Views
13K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
48
Views
7K
Top