Are these quantum states equivalent in Hilbert space representation?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the equivalence of quantum states represented in Hilbert space, specifically examining three states defined in terms of spin states. Participants explore the implications of different coefficients and phases in the representation of these states, considering both theoretical and practical aspects of quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the equivalence of the states ##\left| A \right\rangle##, ##\left| B \right\rangle##, and ##\left| C \right\rangle## depends on the values of ##\alpha##, ##\beta##, and ##\phi##.
  • It is mentioned that in an isolated system, an overall phase does not affect the state, but relative phases between states do matter.
  • One participant suggests that all three states can represent the combination of the two states ##\left| \uparrow \right\rangle## and ##\left| \downarrow \right\rangle##.
  • Another participant proposes that the most general representation is ##\left| B \right\rangle## with constraints on the magnitudes of ##\alpha## and ##\beta##.
  • Concerns are raised about how different choices of coefficients affect the representation of physical operators, such as the Pauli matrices.
  • One participant argues that ##\left| A \right\rangle## and ##\left| C \right\rangle## represent the same state due to the nature of complex phase factors, while ##\left| B \right\rangle## can only represent the same state if ##\alpha = \beta##.
  • Mathematical details regarding the eigenvalue problem for the operator ##\hat{\sigma}_x## are discussed, including the derivation of eigenvalues and eigenvectors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the equivalence of the quantum states, with some asserting that certain states are equivalent under specific conditions while others highlight the importance of the coefficients and phases. The discussion remains unresolved regarding which state best represents a given quantum state.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the discussion involves assumptions about the normalization of states and the independence of the spin states involved. There are also unresolved mathematical steps related to the eigenvalue problem for the operator ##\hat{\sigma}_x##.

Clear Mind
Messages
38
Reaction score
3
I've started few days ago to study quantum physics, and there's a thing which isn't clear to me. I know that a quantum state is represented by a ray in a Hilbert space (so that ##k \left| X \right\rangle## is the same state of ##\left| X \right\rangle##). Suppose now to have these three states:
##\left| A \right\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (\left| \uparrow \right\rangle + \left| \downarrow \right\rangle)##
##\left| B \right\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (\alpha \left| \uparrow \right\rangle + \beta \left| \downarrow \right\rangle)##
##\left| C \right\rangle = \frac{e^{i \phi}}{\sqrt{2}} (\left| \uparrow \right\rangle + \left| \downarrow \right\rangle)##
(where ##\alpha , \beta \in \mathbb{C}## and ##\phi \in \mathbb{R}##)
Question is, are these states rapresenting the same quantum state?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on the values of ##\alpha##, ##\beta##, and ##\phi##. Also, in an isolated system, an overall phase doesn't matter. But relative phases between two objects do.
 
Khashishi said:
It depends on the values of ##\alpha##, ##\beta##, and ##\phi##. Also, in an isolated system, an overall phase doesn't matter. But relative phases between two objects do.
Many thanks Khashishi.
I was wondering another questinon, which of these (##\left| A \right\rangle##, ##\left| B \right\rangle##, ##\left| C \right\rangle##) states best represent the combination of the two states ##\left| \uparrow \right\rangle , \left| \downarrow \right\rangle##?
 
They all do.
 
Khashishi said:
They all do.
My apologies, i didn't explain myself correctly.

For example, suppose to have neutrons (spin ##\frac{1}{2}##) in a state ##\left| G \right\rangle## so that: ##S_x \left| G \right\rangle = \frac{\hbar}{2} \left| G \right\rangle##
and i want to write my state ##\left| G \right\rangle## as a combination of the two eigenvectors ##\left| \uparrow \right\rangle \left| \downarrow \right\rangle## of the operator ##S_z## (where ##S_z \left| \uparrow \downarrow \right\rangle =\pm \frac{\hbar}{2} \left| \uparrow \downarrow \right\rangle##).
In this case, what is the best representation (or the most general one) of ##\left| G \right\rangle##?
All the tree old states ##\left| A \right\rangle##, ##\left| B \right\rangle##, ##\left| C \right\rangle## can correctly represent ##\left| G \right\rangle##?
 
I think the most general representation is ##\left|B\right>## with the additional constraint that ##|\alpha|^2 = 1, |\beta|^2 =1##. If there's nothing else in the system, we are free to choose values, and by convention we would choose ##\left|A\right>##, which is just ##\left|B\right>## with ##\alpha = \beta = 1##. Then the other eigenvalue ##S_x\left|G'\right>=-\frac{\hbar}{2}\left|G'\right>## needs to be chosen to be orthogonal to ##\left|G\right>##, which is conventionally ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\left|\uparrow\right> - \left|\downarrow\right>\right)##, but doesn't have to be.
 
They're not representing exactly the same thing. Choosing different factors will affect what the operators look like, say, Pauli matrices will have different forms. But physically, we only care about probability, which is state vector inner product with itself. Then if we don't care about what the wave function is, we will have freedom to choose a complex phase in |C>.
 
In posting #1, ##|A \rangle## and ##|C \rangle## represent the same state, because the one is just the other multiplied by a complex number. It's even only a phase factor if ##\phi \in \mathbb{R}##, which also doesn't change the overall normalization of the state. Since ##|\uparrow \rangle## and ##|\downarrow \rangle## are linearly independent (they are orthogonal to each other). Thus ##|B \rangle## can only represent the same state as ##|A \rangle## and ##B \rangle## if ##\alpha=\beta##.

Now to the question concerning the eigenvectors of ##\hat{\sigma}_x##. You work in the eigenbasis of ##\hat{\sigma}_z##, where
$$\hat{\sigma}_x=\frac{1}{2} \begin{pmatrix}
0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0
\end{pmatrix}.$$
To solve the eigenvalue problem you start with the characteristic polynomial of this matrix to find the eigenvalues:
$$P(\lambda)=\mathrm{det} (\hat{\sigma}_x-\lambda \hat{1})=\lambda^2-1/4.$$
The eigenvalues are the zeros of this polynomial, i.e., there are 2 different eigenvalues
$$\lambda_{1,2}=\pm \frac{1}{2}.$$
To find the eigenvector for ##\sigma_x=+1/2## you have to solve
$$\hat{x} \begin{pmatrix} \alpha \\ \beta \end{pmatrix}=\frac{1}{2} \begin{pmatrix} \alpha \\ \beta \end{pmatrix}.$$
You only need the first component of this equation:
$$\frac{1}{2}\beta=\frac{1}{2} \alpha.$$
Thus you get
$$|\sigma_x \rangle=1/2 \rangle=\alpha(|\uparrow \rangle + |\downarrow \rangle).$$
Supposed the ##\sigma_z## eigenbasis is orthonormal, you can choose ##\alpha=1/\sqrt{2}## to normalize the eigenvector,
$$\langle \sigma_x | \sigma_x \rangle=1.$$
For the other eigenvector for the eigenvalue ##\sigma_x=-1/2## you should do the calculation yourself.
 
Thank you all for the help :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K