Are You Using the Correct Formula to Convert Redshift to Megaparsecs?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Sagan369963
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Redshift
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
Sign up Log in
2 replies · 15K views
Sagan369963
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
z x c = H x d is the formula I am using to try to convert redshift to megaparsecs, where H I'm taking to be 71km/s/Mpc and c as 299,792.46 km/s. When I plug in .1 for z I get 1.377 Billion Light years (422.2429 Mpc), which sounds right. But when I plug in 10 for z I get the huge distance of 137.717 Billion Light years. Is that because of the comoving universe? I'm really just after the light travel time distance, not really where the galaxy is now. Am I using the wrong formula?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You are using linear relation v=cz, which is not good at larger distances. Try here, just plug redshift value and you will have light travel time distance.
 
To expand a little on Calimero's response:
The equation you are using is the linear approximation of the full expression for the expansion of the universe (given a particular cosmology). Here is an excellent review article which should answer your question in detail http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9905116