Arrival time from two US transducers

  • Thread starter Thread starter enc08
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 1K views
enc08
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Please refer to the attached image.

T1 and T2 are ultrasound transducers. The focal point of the transducers is 2cm into the liver tissue.

Q) A pulse is emitted from both transducers at the same time. Calculate the difference in arrival time at the focal point.


I seem to be getting the wrong answer. This is what I'm doing:

The arrival time from T2 is: [tex]t_{T2} = 1cm/1450 + 2cm/1540 = 19.9us[/tex]

From this we can calculate an equivalent average speed across both tissue:
[tex]c_{equiv} = 3cm/19.9us = 1508.8m/s[/tex]

Using this we'll calculate the arrival time for T1
[tex]t_{T1} = \sqrt{(9.6mm)^2 + (3cm)^2}/c_{equiv} = 20.9us[/tex]

Thus the difference in arrival time is [tex]1us[/tex]
However the answer sheet indicates [tex]0.4us[/tex]

Thanks for your input.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    2.9 KB · Views: 434
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: Snell's law

EDIT: On reflection (pun!) I can see that refraction of the sound wave at the fat/liver interface is not going to make a great deal of difference in the result... So perhaps your answer is correct and the given answer is not.
 
Last edited:
Hi,

Thanks. We aren't expected to consider to reflection in this question.

So my approach of finding the equivalent sound speed is right?
 
enc08 said:
Hi,

Thanks. We aren't expected to consider to reflection in this question.

So my approach of finding the equivalent sound speed is right?

Sure. The method works because, not considering refraction, the ratio of the times spent in each media is the same for both paths.

If refraction was taken into account and resulted in a different ratio, then this would not be the case.