Arrowhead Hunting & Moral Dilemma: Should It Be Preserved?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tribdog
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the ethical considerations and archaeological significance of a site in Battle Mountain where arrowheads are found. Participants explore the historical value of such sites, the implications of disclosing their locations, and the potential interest from archaeologists. The conversation touches on themes of preservation versus recreational use, as well as personal experiences related to arrowhead hunting.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant recalls a childhood experience of finding arrowheads and questions whether the site would interest archaeologists, emphasizing historical value over recreational use.
  • Another mentions a similar secret site in Utah that was discovered by hikers, suggesting that such sites can attract attention.
  • Some participants argue that the site may not add significant new information to existing archaeological knowledge, suggesting it might be better kept secret.
  • There is a concern expressed about the ethics of keeping the site secret, with one participant noting the potential for significant discoveries that could be lost.
  • Participants discuss the prevalence of arrowhead sites and the possibility that the site may not be unique or of major archaeological interest.
  • One participant suggests contacting a known archaeologist on the forum for further insight into the site's significance.
  • There are conflicting views on whether the arrowheads could be classified as Clovis artifacts, with some expressing skepticism about their classification.
  • Legal and ethical considerations regarding hunting for arrowheads on private property are raised, emphasizing the importance of obtaining permission from landowners.
  • Personal anecdotes about finding arrowheads and their historical context are shared, reflecting on past experiences and the value of such artifacts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the significance of the site, with some advocating for its preservation and others suggesting it may not be of substantial archaeological interest. There is no consensus on whether the site should be disclosed or kept secret, and the classification of the arrowheads remains contested.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the existence of numerous arrowhead sites, which may influence the perceived uniqueness of the Battle Mountain site. The discussion also highlights the ethical implications of artifact collection and the responsibilities of those who discover such sites.

tribdog
Messages
768
Reaction score
17
Moving back to Battle Mountain reminded of a place I went when I was little to pick up arrowheads. The ground was absolutely covered with chips and broken arrowheads. I didn't think much about it when I was little, but I'll bet indians were using this spot for hundreds if not thousands of years. The people I've told about it say I shouldn't say anything because they don't want the land placed off limits to hunters and snow mobilers etc. Do you think a site like that would be of interest to an archeologist? I'm not a big outdoorsman so I think the historical value is more important than the recreational. What I don't know is whether sites like this are commonplace or if they are of interest to archeologists.
 
Science news on Phys.org
There is a site like that in Utah, and the owners of the land kept it a secret for generations until a few years ago. I don't remember the details, but I think some hikers found it out let the secret out. Have to look up in the news.
 
yeah, I saw a scientific american episode about that. That site was way different than this one. this is just a place where it looks like they sat around and made arrowheads all day long. there aren't living quarters or cave paintings or anything like that.
 
I say let it be. There are enough arrowheads in museums, and collecting these artifacts and roping them off just has the effect of sucking the life out of them.
 
It probably won't add anything new in textbooks, and whoever comes there would take stuff anyways. So I think it's better to keep it a secret.
 
would an archeologist say that?
 
It's true that there are dozens, hundreds of arrowhead sites, of Clovis, Folsom cultures etc. On the top of my head I think that the number of registered fluted points is something like 27,000. But yet it's rather unethical to keep this place a secret. There may be big new discoveries waiting, filling in a lot of blanks science it struggling with which may be lost forever if kept secret. It's not that science can claim the grounds and deny other use.

Anyway I'm sure this thread is going to have Evo's undivided attention and of her friends, DrPaleo.
 
tribdog said:
would an archeologist say that?

Perhaps you could select some examples that look representative? Then you could take them to an archaeologist or take pics of them and e-mail them about to see if there is any real interest. If there is none ... then hike in peace.

Plus you have some curios from antiquity that holds memories for you.
 
A quick look turned up a lot of arrowhead sellers. If you make the location known you may just attract people looking to scrounge up as many artifacts as possible for sale. So if you do let it out you may want to be careful who you tell and how you tell them.
 
  • #10
Arrowheads are a dime a dozen. But the site may be of archeological interest in some larger context. What does a site like this indicate? Did a big tribe migrating from one place to another find a huge flint deposit here and stop for a month furiously making arrowheads for the rest of the trip, or is a fixed tribe's traditional flint napping area?
 
  • #11
I just spent the weekend four wheeling with my friends. I found arrowheads all over the place. Maybe that other spot isn't so special after all.
 
  • #12
tribdog said:
Moving back to Battle Mountain reminded of a place I went when I was little to pick up arrowheads. The ground was absolutely covered with chips and broken arrowheads. I didn't think much about it when I was little, but I'll bet indians were using this spot for hundreds if not thousands of years. The people I've told about it say I shouldn't say anything because they don't want the land placed off limits to hunters and snow mobilers etc. Do you think a site like that would be of interest to an archeologist? I'm not a big outdoorsman so I think the historical value is more important than the recreational. What I don't know is whether sites like this are commonplace or if they are of interest to archeologists.
We have one of the US's most foremost archaeologists specializing in Clovis culture on this forum. DrPaleo, he usually only works sites he is sent to, but you could talk to him. Send him a PM.
 
  • #13
I really don't think this is Clovis. I'd say 99.9% sure. I'm not an archeologist, but there have been Indians in this area for thousands of years and some of them still live here, they aren't Clovis. DrPaleo would be able to give me an answer to my question though.
 
  • #14
tribdog said:
I really don't think this is Clovis. I'd say 99.9% sure. I'm not an archeologist, but there have been Indians in this area for thousands of years and some of them still live here, they aren't Clovis. DrPaleo would be able to give me an answer to my question though.

Take some pictures and post them.
 
  • #15
I love arrowheads and I’m curious. Did you ever find out if they were Clovis arrowheads?
LEGAL SAFETY- The best arrowhead hunting takes place on private property. You should never trespass in order to hunt, as you do not own the arrowheads and have no right to take them from the person who does. The fact that the property owner does not know they are there does not give you any special rights.

Always ask permission BEFORE you go hunting. Offer to eventually give the landowner any arrowheads you find as long as you can play with them for a few months. Most landowners will let you keep them forever, and will be your friend for just as long. The friendships you make with landowners can last a lifetime and will almost certainly be more valuable than anything you could find.

It is important to remember that it does not matter how responsible you are on site if you tell the location of a site to someone who will go over and dig the place up. Telling a professional archaeologist what you have found is not nearly as risky as telling your coworkers or the guys at the bar. It is far better to keep your mouth shut, except to the landowner and to a professional archaeologist. Believe this, or learn the hard way.
 
  • #16
I remember as a child seeing a vast collection of arrowheads that belonged to a farmer. He said that they came up every year when he plowed. He had lots of them displayed in glass frames, and lots more of them in boxes. He was making no secret of it, but this was 50 years ago. Perhaps he or his descendents regret displaying them now.
 
  • #17
Jimmy Snyder said:
I remember as a child seeing a vast collection of arrowheads that belonged to a farmer. He said that they came up every year when he plowed. He had lots of them displayed in glass frames, and lots more of them in boxes. He was making no secret of it, but this was 50 years ago. Perhaps he or his descendents regret displaying them now.

My parents are grain farmers and every couple of years we find an arrow head that is brought to the surface from our equipment. One year they found a stone hammer with deep grooves where the ropes had been, it was pretty cool.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
9K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
69K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
10K
Replies
6
Views
5K