Aussie Student Solves Mystery of Missing Mass in Universe

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter narrator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Amelia Fraser-McKelvie, a 22-year-old Australian university student, has identified a portion of the "missing mass" in the universe during her internship at Monash University's School of Physics. This discovery, explained by Dr. Kevin Pimbblet, reveals that ordinary mass, previously undetectable, resides within "filaments of galaxies." The breakthrough not only addresses a long-standing astrophysical mystery but also highlights the broader societal impacts of pure research, including advancements in technology derived from physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of astrophysics concepts, particularly "missing mass" and "ordinary mass."
  • Familiarity with galaxy structures, specifically "filaments of galaxies."
  • Knowledge of the significance of pure research in technological advancements.
  • Basic comprehension of general relativity and its applications in technology.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of "filaments of galaxies" in cosmic structure formation.
  • Investigate the implications of "missing mass" on current astrophysical theories.
  • Explore how advancements in physics research have historically influenced technology development.
  • Study the relationship between general relativity and modern technologies like GPS.
USEFUL FOR

Astrophysicists, physics students, technology developers, and anyone interested in the intersection of pure research and technological innovation.

narrator
Messages
241
Reaction score
17
From http://au.news.yahoo.com/latest/a/-/latest/9533373/aussie-girl-solves-mystey/" :

SYDNEY, May 27, 2011 (AFP) - - A 22-year-old Australian university student has solved a problem which has puzzled astrophysicists for decades, discovering part of the so-called "missing mass" of the universe during her summer break.

Undergraduate Amelia Fraser-McKelvie made the breakthrough during a holiday internship with a team at Monash University's School of Physics, locating the mystery material within vast structures called "filaments of galaxies".

Monash astrophysicist Dr Kevin Pimbblet explained that scientists had previously detected matter that was present in the early history of the universe but that could not now be located.

"There is missing mass, ordinary mass not dark mass ... It's missing to the present day," Pimbblet told AFP.

"We don't know where it went. Now we do know where it went because that's what Amelia found."

The article goes on to describe it further, and near the end there's this gem:

Pimbblet admitted the discovery was primarily academic, but he said previous physics research had led to the development of diverse other technologies.

"Whenever I speak to people who have influence, politicians and so on, they sometimes ask me 'Why should I invest in physics pure research?'. And I sometimes say to them: 'Do you use a mobile phone? Some of that technology came about by black hole research'.

"The pure research has knock-on effects to the whole society which are sometimes difficult to anticipate."

It sounds like a great discovery (at least to this lay person). How significant is this find? Does it validate/invalidate any theories? And does it act as a guide to a next step in the science?

As a side note, does anyone know how black hole research aided mobile phone technology?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Space news on Phys.org
narrator said:
As a side note, does anyone know how black hole research aided mobile phone technology?

People love to make claims like that, but they're ultimately impossible to verify. If you spend $x of tax money on academic research and it seems to have the indirect result of causing the development of technology y, there's no way to know that y wouldn't have been developed if the $x had remained in the private sector.

A better argument is that GPS wouldn't work without general relativity. That's not an indirect effect -- you simply can't make the technology work without taking GR into account.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
407
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K