MHB -aux.03 P(X-x) find P, find X, from table

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Table
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on calculating the probability distribution and expected value of a discrete variable X based on a provided probability table. Participants confirm that the missing probability p for x=2 is 0.31, ensuring the total probability sums to 1. The expected value E[X] is calculated using the formula E[X]=∑(x_k * P_k), resulting in an expected value of 2. The conversation highlights the importance of accuracy in calculations, particularly when using calculators like the TI-Nspire CX CAS and TI-89 Titanium.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of discrete probability distributions
  • Familiarity with expected value calculations
  • Basic knowledge of probability notation and summation
  • Experience with scientific calculators or computational tools
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn the properties of discrete probability distributions
  • Study the concept of expected value in depth
  • Explore the use of calculators like TI-Nspire CX CAS for statistical computations
  • Research box plots and their applications in data analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in statistics, data analysts, and anyone interested in mastering probability calculations and distributions.

karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
The probability distribution of the discrete variable X is given by the following table
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/1099

(a) Find the value of p where x=2.
(b) Calculate the expected value of X in P(X-x)

I am basically clueless about this, but is $\mu=3$
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
a) You want the sum of the probabilities to be 1.

b) $$E[X]=\sum_{k=1}^5x_kP_k$$

What do you find?
 
MarkFL said:
a) You want the sum of the probabilities to be 1.

b) $$E[X]=\sum_{k=1}^5x_kP_k$$

What do you find?

does this mean $p=1-(0.4+0.2+0.07+0.02)=.31$
 
karush said:
does this mean $p=1-(0.4+0.2+0.07+0.02)=.31$

Yes, that's correct.

Now, to find the expect value, find the sum of the products of the x-values and their corresponding probabilities.
 
MarkFL said:
Yes, that's correct.

Now, to find the expect value, find the sum of the products of the x-values and their corresponding probabilities.

$$(1\times0.4)+(2\times.31)+(3\times0.2)+(4\times0.07)+(5\times0.02)=2$$
 
karush said:
$$(1\times0.4)+(2\times.31)+(3\times0.2)+(4\times0.07)+(5\times0.02)=2$$

I get a slightly higher value...are you rounding because $X$ is given as discrete?
 
uhmmm, well, don't recall any rounding. just let the WF compute it.

no sure what is meant by discrete
 
karush said:
uhmmm, well, don't recall any rounding. just let the WF compute it.

no sure what is meant by discrete

Did you recompute and get the same value?

As an example, the set of integers is discrete, while the set of real numbers is continuous.
 
MarkFL said:
I get a slightly higher value...are you rounding because $X$ is given as discrete?

I accidentally entered a wrong value in my calculator...2 is correct.
 
  • #10
MarkFL said:
I accidentally entered a wrong value in my calculator...2 is correct.

no worry, it happens, too often for me even after double checking

just curious what Calc do you have ... I have the TI-Nspire CX CAS.. its really nice
but I go to WF a lot too...

I'll be posting another probability distribution problem next, I seem to be getting the hang of it ... also want to get proficient with box plots

Much Mahalo
 
  • #11
I have a TI-89 Titanium, although in this case I used W|A. Had I used the TI, I might not have made the error as I could have been looking at the data table as I entered the numbers. :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K