Average of momentum for stationary state

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the expectation value of momentum in stationary states within quantum mechanics. Participants explore the conditions under which the expectation value of momentum is zero, particularly in relation to the separation of time and position components in wavefunctions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that the expectation value of momentum is always zero for stationary states and questions if it remains zero when time-dependent parts of the wavefunction cancel out.
  • Another participant counters that a plane wave, which can be expressed as a product of space and time components, has a nonzero momentum, suggesting that the initial claim may not hold universally.
  • A third participant points out that the example of a plane wave is not a normalizable state and argues that normalizable states can be expressed as a product of time and position components only if they are stationary states.
  • Some participants challenge the notion that all product states are eigenstates of the Hamiltonian, indicating that this could lead to misunderstandings regarding the time-independent Schrödinger equation (TISE).
  • There is a clarification regarding the implications of expressing a wavefunction as a product of spatial and temporal components, with emphasis on the relationship to the TISE.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the conditions under which the expectation value of momentum is zero, with multiple competing views on the nature of product states and their relation to stationary states.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of normalizable states and the implications of product states in the context of the Hamiltonian and the Schrödinger equations.

CyberShot
Messages
133
Reaction score
2
I know that the expectation value of momentum is always 0 for a stationary state.

But, is <p> always zero when the time-dependent parts of the wavefunction cancel out?

Is the following statement true?


<p> = 0 when the full wavefunction can be separated into a time component times the position component.





because the time parts of the conjugates will always cancel out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, because for example a plane wave ~ exp(i(kx-wt)) can be written as a product of a space component and a time component, and has nonzero momentum k.
 
Bill K's example is not a normalizable state. I think it is correct to say that any normalizable state for which you can write [tex]\psi(x, t) = X(x)T(t)[/tex] is a stationary state.
 
That can't be right, not all product states are eigenstates of the Hamiltonian...otherwise, why would we even bother to ever try to solve the TISE for X(x)? Am I missing something here...?
 
Matterwave said:
That can't be right, not all product states are eigenstates of the Hamiltonian...otherwise, why would we even bother to ever try to solve the TISE for X(x)? Am I missing something here...?

If [tex]\psi(x, t)[/tex] is a solution of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation and can be written as [tex]\psi(x, t) = X(x)T(t)[/tex] then X(x) is a solution of the time-independent Schrödinger equation, yes? That's what I was trying to say above.
 
Oh, because the way you phrased it, it seemed like you were suggesting the wave-function could be ANY normalizable product state.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K