Axioms of Set Theory: Separation Axiom and Garling Theorem 1.2.2 .... ....

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the necessity of the Separation Axiom in proving Theorem 1.2.2 from D. J. H. Garling's "A Course in Mathematical Analysis: Volume I Foundations and Elementary Real Analysis." Participants clarify that the Separation Axiom is essential for establishing the existence of a set referenced in the theorem, specifically linking the set $A$ in the axiom to $\Omega$ in the theorem. This relationship underscores the foundational role of the Separation Axiom in set theory proofs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Separation Axiom in set theory
  • Familiarity with Theorem 1.2.2 from Garling's text
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical proofs and logic
  • Concept of set existence in axiomatic frameworks
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Separation Axiom in detail within set theory
  • Review the proof of Theorem 1.2.2 in Garling's "A Course in Mathematical Analysis"
  • Explore the implications of axioms in mathematical proofs
  • Investigate other axioms of set theory and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of mathematical analysis, and anyone interested in the foundations of set theory and its axioms.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading D. J. H. Garling: "A Course in Mathematical Analysis: Volume I Foundations and Elementary Real Analysis ... ...At present I am focused on Chapter 1: The Axioms of Set Theory and need some help with Theorem 1.2.2 and its relationship to the Separation Axiom ... ...

The Separation Axiom and Theorem 1.2.2 read as follows:
View attachment 6137

Garling argues that the Separation Axiom needs to be in place before we can prove Theorem 1.2.2 ... ... but I cannot see where the Separation Axiom is needed in the proof of Theorem 1.2.2 ...

Can someone give a clear explanation of exactly why we need the Separation Axiom in order to prove Theorem 1.2.2.

Help will be much appreciated ... ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Peter,

Peter said:
Garling argues that the Separation Axiom needs to be in place before we can prove Theorem 1.2.2 ... ... but I cannot see where the Separation Axiom is needed in the proof of Theorem 1.2.2 ...

The application of the Separation Axiom is what justifies the statement "and so there exists a set $b=\ldots$" The set $A$ in the axiom statement is $\Omega$ in the theorem. Does this help?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K