Azimuthally Symmetric Potential for a Spherical Conductor

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a problem related to the azimuthally symmetric potential of a spherical conductor, specifically from the textbook "Principles of Electrodynamics." The original poster attempts to apply boundary conditions to determine coefficients in a series expansion of the potential, leading to integrals involving Legendre polynomials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster describes their approach to solving the potential and expresses difficulty in evaluating integrals for even values of n. Some participants question the limits of integration and suggest writing out the integrands for specific cases.

Discussion Status

The discussion has evolved with participants clarifying points about the integrals and acknowledging that only specific terms are necessary to address the problem. There is recognition that the original poster's concerns may not be as complex as initially thought.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of boundary conditions and the behavior of Legendre polynomials, with specific attention to the symmetry of the integration limits affecting the evaluation of the integrals.

Loonuh
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


BSWCL.jpg


Homework Equations

/

The Attempt at a Solution

[/B]
I am trying to solve problem 2-13 from my textbook "Principles of Electrodynamics" (see image below).

I believe that I should be solving the potential as

<br /> \varphi(r,\theta) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty (A_n r^n + \frac{B_n}{r^{n+1}})P_n(\cos\theta),<br />

where A_n and B_n are determined by the boundary condition of the conductor. For r &lt; R we should have that B_n = 0 to make sure the potential is finite and for r &gt; R we should have that A_n = 0 to ensure that the potential goes to 0 at infinity. That being said, at r=R, we can apply the boundary conditions such that we

A_n^{in} = \frac{2n+1}{2a^n}\int_{-1}^{1}\varphi(R,\theta)P_n(\cos\theta)d\cos\theta

and

B_n^{out} = \frac{2n+1}{2}a^{n+1}\int_{-1}^{1}\varphi(R,\theta)P_n(\cos\theta)d\cos\theta.

Now, my problem comes when I want to solve these two integrals because it appears to me that if I apply the boundary condition, namely that

<br /> \varphi = 0 \;\;\;\; \frac{3}{2} &lt; \cos\theta &lt; 1\\<br /> \varphi = \varphi_0 \;\;\;\; \frac{-\sqrt{3}}{2} &lt; \cos\theta &lt; \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\\<br /> \varphi = 0 \;\;\;\; -1 &lt; \cos\theta &lt; -\frac{3}{2}<br />

then the above two integrals reduce to

A_n^{in} = \frac{2n+1}{2a^n}\int_{-\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}}^{\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}}\varphi_0P_n(\cos\theta)d\cos\theta

and

B_n^{out} = \frac{2n+1}{2}a^{n+1}\int_{-\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}}^{\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}}\varphi_0P_n(\cos\theta)d\cos\theta

respectively.

Now, since P_n are odd functions for odd n, A_n^{in} and B_n^{out} appear to be 0 for all of the odd values of n. However, the problem arises now when I am trying to evaluate these integrals in general for even values of n, in this case the results seem intractable because I am trying to integrate the Legendre Polynomials over a symmetric interval where the limits are not -1 and 1.

From my understanding, this problem should be as straightforward as applying the boundary conditions as I have done to solve for the potential, is there something that I am overlooking?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that cos(60o) ≠ √3/2.

You say the integrals appear to be intractable. Did you write out the integrands explicitly for n = 0 and n = 2?
 
Whoops, limits should be +-1/2. I meant that
the general solutions to the integrals seem intractable, but I turns out that you only need
the 0 and 2 terms to answer all of the parts of the problem, so then this is actually very easy.
 
OK. Good!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K