MHB -b.3.1.9 Find the solution of y''+y'-2y=0\quad y(0)=1; y'(0)=1.

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\textit{given $y''+y'-2y=0\quad y(0)=1 \quad y'(0)=1$ }$
\begin{align*}\displaystyle
\textit{if } r&=e^{t} \textit{then:}\\
y''+y'-2y&=r^2+r-2=(r+2)(r-1)=0\\
&=c_1^{2t}+c_2^{-t}\\
y&=\color{red} {e^t; \quad y \to \infty \,as \, t \to \infty }
\end{align*}ok the bk answer is in red
I just don't get this
why do we need $$y(0)=1 \quad y'(0)=1$$

the graph of $y=e^t$

3.1.9.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
karush said:
$\textit{given $y''+y'-2y=0\quad y(0)=1 \quad y'(0)=1$ }$
\begin{align*}\displaystyle
\textit{if } r&=e^{t} \textit{then:}\\
y''+y'-2y&=r^2+r-2=(r+2)(r-1)=0\\
&=c_1^{2t}+c_2^{-t}\\
y&=\color{red} {e^t; \quad y \to \infty \,as \, t \to \infty }
\end{align*}ok the bk answer is in red
I just don't get this
why do we need $$y(0)=1 \quad y'(0)=1$$
The auxiliary equation $r^2 + r - 2 = 0$ factorises as $(r+2)(r-1)=0$, with solutions $r = -2$ and $r=1$. That tells you that the differential equation has solutions $y = e^{-2t}$ and $y = e^t$. The general solution is then $y = c_1e^{-2t} + c_2e^t$, where $c_1$ and $c_2$ are constants. To find the value of those constants, you need to use the conditions $y(0)=1$ and $y'(0)=1$. In fact, if you put $t=0$ in the equation $y = c_1e^{-2t} + c_2e^t$, it tells you that $1 = c_1 + c_2$. If you then differentiate the formula for $y$ and again put $t=0$, it will give you another equation for $c_1$ and $c_2$. You should find that $c_1=0$ and $c_2=1$, so that the solution becomes $y=e^t$.
 
I have the equation ##F^x=m\frac {d}{dt}(\gamma v^x)##, where ##\gamma## is the Lorentz factor, and ##x## is a superscript, not an exponent. In my textbook the solution is given as ##\frac {F^x}{m}t=\frac {v^x}{\sqrt {1-v^{x^2}/c^2}}##. What bothers me is, when I separate the variables I get ##\frac {F^x}{m}dt=d(\gamma v^x)##. Can I simply consider ##d(\gamma v^x)## the variable of integration without any further considerations? Can I simply make the substitution ##\gamma v^x = u## and then...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K