Balloon Analogy - 3D universe on a 2D plane

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the balloon analogy used to explain the nature of the universe, particularly how a 3D universe can be represented on a 2D surface. Participants explore the implications of this analogy and its limitations, especially when considering multiple planes of stars.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about how a 3D universe can be depicted on a 2D plane, questioning the validity of the balloon analogy.
  • One participant suggests that to understand the analogy, one must imagine the balloon surface as the entirety of the universe, excluding any inside or outside dimensions.
  • Another point raised is the consideration of an additional physical dimension, proposing a 3D surface of a 4D balloon as a way to conceptualize the universe.
  • Some participants note that 2D representations are used for simplicity in illustrations, not because they imply the universe is actually 2D.
  • Several participants recommend external links related to the balloon analogy, indicating a shared interest in further exploration of the topic.
  • There is a mention of combining the balloon analogy with another article for better understanding, suggesting a collaborative approach to learning.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and acceptance of the balloon analogy, with some agreeing on its usefulness while others remain skeptical about its implications. The discussion reflects multiple competing views and does not reach a consensus on the analogy's validity or limitations.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations noted include the abstract nature of the analogy and the challenge of visualizing higher dimensions, which may affect participants' interpretations and understanding.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring cosmology, theoretical physics, or anyone seeking to understand complex analogies in the context of the universe's structure.

Souhardya Nandi
Messages
17
Reaction score
3
This has been a real famous analogy and I understand it, except the fact that the balloon surface is a 2D structure. How is it possible to depict a 3D universe on a 2D plane ? What happens when we work with stars at multiple planes ?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Souhardya Nandi said:
This has been a real famous analogy and I understand it, except the fact that the balloon surface is a 2D structure. How is it possible to depict a 3D universe on a 2D plane ? What happens when we work with stars at multiple planes ?

There are two things you have to imagine in order to understand the balloon analogy. These are not necessarily easy to grasp, depending on how well you can think abstractly and mathematically:

1) You have to imagine that the surface of the balloon is all there is. A real 2D balloon surface, of course, has an inside and an outside. But, imagine that the inside and outside simply do not exist and that only the surface exists.

2) You have to imagine an additional physical dimension - in this case the 3D surface of a 4D balloon. In this case, as above, the 3D "surface" is all there is: again the space you may imagine inside and outside the 3D surface simply does not exist.

Note that all the models you have seen that use 2D shapes for the universe do so because this is easier to draw. Not because the universe is really 2D! (Although, recently we had someone on here who would not accept this and insisted that all the 2D models of the universe were that way because the universe really is 2D! That was a puzzle that he never solved.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Souhardya Nandi
Souhardya Nandi said:
This has been a real famous analogy and I understand it, except the fact that the balloon surface is a 2D structure. How is it possible to depict a 3D universe on a 2D plane ? What happens when we work with stars at multiple planes ?
I recommend the link in my signature
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Comeback City, ISamson and PeroK
phinds said:
I recommend the link in my signature

Having just read it, I recommend it too!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phinds
PeroK said:
Having just read it, I recommend it too!
As a beginner here, I don't really know how to access the signature of someone. Can you please guide me ?
 
Souhardya Nandi said:
As a beginner here, I don't really know how to access the signature of someone. Can you please guide me ?
You click on the link in the signature
 
PeroK said:
Having just read it, I recommend it too!
I agree, read it @Souhardya Nandi
 
@ Phinds Evidentally I need to replace the hyperlink to your balloon analogy on my web page lol
 
  • #10
Mordred said:
@ Phinds Evidentally I need to replace the hyperlink to your balloon analogy on my web page lol
You mean because I move the body to the Insights article?
 
  • #11
lol yeah several of your other links I already have on my page. I always found your balloon analogy coverage well done. I've seen it have good success with numerous posters over the years.

I also usually combine it with Bapowell's article the combo seems to work well
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phinds

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
12K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K