Basic Poker Immediate Odds Question

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Master1022
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating immediate odds in poker, specifically focusing on the probability of completing a flush given a specific hand and community cards. Participants explore the implications of including unknown opponent cards in the calculation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes calculating the probability of getting a diamond on the river using the formula P(diamond in the river) = # diamonds left / # cards left, arriving at 9/44.
  • Another participant suggests that the correct denominator should be 46, accounting for the total number of cards seen (6 cards) and the unknown cards held by the opponent.
  • Some participants clarify that including opponents' cards is necessary because those cards could contain diamonds, which affects the probability calculation.
  • A participant points out that the original scenario needs correction, noting that the King of Diamonds (Kd) cannot appear on the flop since it is one of the player's hole cards.
  • There is a mention of other cards that could improve the player's hand without completing the flush.
  • A later reply acknowledges a mix-up in terminology, confirming the intent was to discuss completing the flush.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct calculation method and the inclusion of unknown cards. There is no consensus on the best approach to determining the probability.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of accounting for unknown cards in probability calculations, but the discussion does not resolve the nuances of the calculations or assumptions made.

Master1022
Messages
590
Reaction score
116
TL;DR
Quick question about calculation of immediate odds in a poker hand.
Hi,

Just have a quick conceptual question about calculating immediate odds in poker.

Question: Your hand is Ad Kd. The four cards on the table (flop and turn) are: Kd 7h 4d. What is the probability of getting a flop on the river? (scenario is that we are playing with one opponent)

At first, I thought that this would be calculated by doing P(diamond\, in\, the\, river) = \frac{\# \, diamonds\, left}{\# \, cards\, left} = \frac{9}{44}. I have gotten the 9 from the fact that there are currently 4 known diamonds on the table (13 - 4 = 9) and there are 8 cards in play (52 - 8 = 44). However, the blog post quotes a different probability and when I work it back, they seem to use 46 in the denominator. I don't properly have an intuition of why we are including our opponents' cards in the total number of cards?

The answer quoted is: 19.56%

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Master1022 said:
Summary:: Quick question about calculation of immediate odds in a poker hand.

Hi,

Just have a quick conceptual question about calculating immediate odds in poker.

Question: Your hand is Ad Kd. The four cards on the table (flop and turn) are: Kd 7h 4d. What is the probability of getting a flop on the river? (scenario is that we are playing with one opponent)

At first, I thought that this would be calculated by doing P(diamond\, in\, the\, river) = \frac{\# \, diamonds\, left}{\# \, cards\, left} = \frac{9}{44}. I have gotten the 9 from the fact that there are currently 4 known diamonds on the table (13 - 4 = 9) and there are 8 cards in play (52 - 8 = 44). However, the blog post quotes a different probability and when I work it back, they seem to use 46 in the denominator. I don't properly have an intuition of why we are including our opponents' cards in the total number of cards?

The answer quoted is: 19.56%

Thanks in advance.
You need to correct your scenario. 1) As Diamond King (Kd) is one of your hole cards, it cannot appear on the flop. 2) You need to show a fourth card on the table after the turn. Also, I presume you mean "probability of completing a flush".

Using 46 remaining cards seems correct. You have seen 2+4=6 cards. 52-6 = 46 remaining cards. You may ignore the "burn" cards since they are unknown. Of those 46 remaining cards, 9 are diamonds.

There are other cards that can improve your hand without making the flush.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Master1022
Master1022 said:
I don't properly have an intuition of why we are including our opponents' cards in the total number of cards?
Because some diamonds might be in the opponent's cards. Since they are unknown, they must be included in the entire set of cards where the remaining diamonds might be.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Master1022
Master1022 said:
I don't properly have an intuition of why we are including our opponents' cards in the total number of cards?

The simple answer is because you don't know how many diamonds your opponent holds. Excluding those cards from your calculations effectively assumes your opponent holds no diamonds.

Sometimes to see these things you can take a more extreme example. Suppose you hold 23 cards, with 7 diamonds. And your opponent holds 23 cards. Six cards remain "in the river".

By you calculation the remaining six cards would be all six remaning diamonds! As follows:

P(diamond\, in\, the\, river) = \frac{\# \, diamonds\, left}{\# \, cards\, left} = \frac{6}{6} = 1
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Master1022
Klystron said:
You need to correct your scenario. 1) As Diamond King (Kd) is one of your hole cards, it cannot appear on the flop. 2) You need to show a fourth card on the table after the turn. Also, I presume you mean "probability of completing a flush".

Using 46 remaining cards seems correct. You have seen 2+4=6 cards. 52-6 = 46 remaining cards. You may ignore the "burn" cards since they are unknown. Of those 46 remaining cards, 9 are diamonds.

There are other cards that can improve your hand without making the flush.
Yes, sorry, I mixed up the terminology - I was looking for completing the flush
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron
OKay, thank you all for posting - that does clear things up!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
7K