Basketball (Energy and its Conservation?)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a basketball physics problem involving energy conservation, specifically analyzing the motion of a basketball as it is shot and reaches its peak height. The original poster presents a scenario where a basketball player shoots a ball, providing details about the ball's mass, initial speed, and height reached.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the application of energy conservation principles, questioning the use of kinematic equations and the need to consider vector components in projectile motion. There is discussion about defining initial and final states in terms of kinetic and potential energy.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the relevance of separating components in projectile motion and the appropriateness of using energy conservation methods. There is acknowledgment of potential errors in the original calculations, and a few participants express uncertainty about the correctness of the initial approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of understanding the context of energy conservation and the implications of using one-dimensional motion equations in a two-dimensional scenario. There are references to the original poster's confusion regarding the application of certain equations and the need for clarification on the definitions of 'before' and 'after' in the context of energy states.

Chilling
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A basketball player shoots a 3-point shot. The 0.625 kg ball leaves the player's hands with a speed of 9m/s. It rises 2.4m before descending towards the basket. at the top of the ball's arc, what is its speed

Homework Equations



Im at a chapter named Energy and its conservation so I am guessing i have to use these
PE=mgh
E= KE + PE
KE(before)+PE(before)=KE(after)+PE(after)

The Attempt at a Solution


I also tried some other equations such as
Velocity(final)^2= V(initial)^2 + 2a(d)
V(f)= 9^2 + 2(9.8(don't know if it would be gravity))(2.4)
(Please try to fix any wrong ideas that i have in my head)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know projectile motion? Essentially, do you realize that the velocity might have two components, in both x and y directions?
 
Like vector addition?
 
Yeah
 
And that you might have to deal with the components separately, because the equations that you've used are only valid for 1 Dimensional motion (unless you write them in vector form, and you haven't done that).
 
erisedk said:
And that you might have to deal with the components separately, because the equations that you've used are only valid for 1 Dimensional motion (unless you write them in vector form, and you haven't done that).
That is true if one is to apply the SUVAT equations here. However, this is unnecessary and does not seem to fit with the intent of the question. It is most easily answered entirely in terms of work conservation, without considering separate components or vectors.
@Chilling, define 'before' and 'after' in the equation you quote in the context of this question. What do you know about the KE and PE at those times?
 
Actually my teachers answer was incorrect, I also checked with my classmates thanks for the help. The attempt I made was correct using Velocity(final)^2= V(initial)^2 + 2a(d).
 
Chilling said:
Actually my teachers answer was incorrect, I also checked with my classmates thanks for the help. The attempt I made was correct using Velocity(final)^2= V(initial)^2 + 2a(d).
Yes, that equation is right, and I'm glad to hear you got the right answer, but what you posted originally is wrong:
Chilling said:
V(f)= 9^2 + 2(9.8)(2.4)
That would give a speed greater than the initial speed.
 
haruspex said:
Yes, that equation is right, and I'm glad to hear you got the right answer, but what you posted originally is wrong:

That would give a speed greater than the initial speed.
Oh I see i forgot the squared on velocity final
 
  • #10
Chilling said:
Oh I see i forgot the squared on velocity final
Funny - I didn't even notice that. There's another error.
 
  • #11
I'm sorry, I didn't pay attention to it being from energy conservation. I was thinking in terms of this, especially since it mentioned ball's ARC--
Hmax = (u2(sinθ)2)/2g. (Formula for maximum height in a projectile)

Hence find usinθ, i.e., y component of the velocity.

Using (usinθ)2 + (ucosθ)2 = u2 we get ucosθ, i.e., the x component of the initial velocity, which is the only velocity that remains at the top of the ball's arc (since the y component of the velocity has become 0).
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K