Bayes Theorem Question - Am I doing this right?

RedPhoenix
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Another Conditional Problem...

Lie Detector is
95% reliable when the person is guilty
98% reliable when innocent

Random Person pulled from a pool of people... This pool is 6% guilty of theft and 94% have never stolen...

Random person was determined guilty from the lie detector, what is the probability he is innocent?

-------------------------------
My attempt...

(.95)(.06) / [(.95)(.06) + (.02)(1-.06)] = .7512 . so 75.12% chance of him being guilty. Seems low, but I guess the fact that the pool of people has only 6% guilty in it, it lowers the chance a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I get
(.95)(.06) / [(.95)(.06) + (.02)(1-.06)] = .7520
This is a famous paradox
If a test is fairly accurate, but the population mostly negative a positive test is not very reliable.
 
lurflurf said:
I get
(.95)(.06) / [(.95)(.06) + (.02)(1-.06)] = .7520
This is a famous paradox
If a test is fairly accurate, but the population mostly negative a positive test is not very reliable.

Pretty crazy, but thanks for the help :)
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top