Becoming More Critical - Is it Normal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PookDo
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the normalization of critical thinking in individuals transitioning from non-scientific backgrounds to scientific inquiry. Participants agree that increased knowledge in science and mathematics fosters skepticism towards unsubstantiated claims, a fundamental aspect of the scientific method. The conversation highlights the importance of balancing skepticism with an open mind, emphasizing that one should not accept ideas without evidence. Additionally, the dialogue critiques the self-help industry, labeling many practitioners as manipulative and equating their promises to "snake oil."

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the scientific method and its principles
  • Familiarity with critical thinking and skepticism
  • Knowledge of self-help industry dynamics and common practices
  • Awareness of logical fallacies and advertising techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore Richard Feynman's lectures on the scientific method
  • Research the psychological effects of self-help literature
  • Learn about logical fallacies and their impact on decision-making
  • Investigate the principles of skepticism in scientific inquiry
USEFUL FOR

Individuals transitioning into scientific fields, critical thinkers, skeptics of self-help practices, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of belief and evidence in personal development.

PookDo
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Yet another silly question but I am not sure if I told you folks but I come from a very narrow minded non science background and was introduced to math and physics by my wife and by watching Bing Bang Theory and Doctor Who. Strangely more often than not as I learn more about sciende and math I also find myself becoming very critical of what I would see as possibly hokum. Is that normal?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd say it's normal. The more one knows about the world, the more critical one becomes.

I'd also say that it's a very good thing to become critical. Being critical and doubting things is the very nature of science. One should ideally be critical about everything. You shouldn't believe anything until evidence is presented. This includes scientific statements as well. This is the scientific method.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYPapE-3FRw
 
PookDo said:
Yet another silly question but I am not sure if I told you folks but I come from a very narrow minded non science background and was introduced to math and physics by my wife and by watching Bing Bang Theory and Doctor Who. Strangely more often than not as I learn more about sciende and math I also find myself becoming very critical of what I would see as possibly hokum. Is that normal?

Perfectly normal, and a necessary quality for a scientist or a scientifically minded person. :smile:
 
Thanks for the replies. Good to know. I will watch the video when I get home from work.I have watched some of the Richard Feynman lecture's on YouTube
 
Dembadon said:
Perfectly normal, and a necessary quality for a scientist or a scientifically minded person. :smile:

I'd say that it is a necessary quality for every human being. But now I expect too much of people.
 
micromass said:
I'd say that it is a necessary quality for every human being. But now I expect too much of people.

I know what you mean. Sadly with the exception of one or two people I am usually very disappointed
 
I used to love stories about the paranormal when I was little. I didn't believe them, but found them entertaining.

Now I know too much and can't even bear to watch or read them. Or more likely they have become so outrageously unbelievable only a complete fool can tolerate how outrageous the stories have become.

Classics like the 1963 "The Haunting" are so well done as a pshycological thriller, they will always be watchable.
 
Evo said:
I used to love stories about the paranormal when I was little. I didn't believe them, but found them entertaining.

Now I know too much and can't even bear to watch or read them. Or more likely they have become so outrageously unbelievable only a complete fool can tolerate how outrageous the stories have become.

Classics like the 1963 "The Haunting" are so well done as a pshycological thriller, they will always be watchable.

I know what you mean. I used to be what most would call a self help junkie. Always looking for a quick fix. My wife hated how much money I would spend on stupid crap. It wasn't until we had our one and only argument about "The Secret" in our coming up on six years of being married that I started to see what snake oil it all is. The irony is that all these self help folks as of late endlessly talk about how thoughts are things and that you attract things with you thoughts yet one of the so called gurus in The Secret was just sentenced to 9 years in prision.
 
All of the "self help" people are shysters and manipulators. The only help they are interested in is helping your money get into their bank.
 
  • #10
Evo said:
All of the "self help" people are shysters and manipulators. The only help they are interested in is helping your money get into their bank.

Indeed, they are scum! Soooo, anybdoy interested in dolphin healing?
 
  • #11
micromass said:
Indeed, they are scum! Soooo, anybdoy interested in dolphin healing?

is that code?
 
  • #12
PookDo said:
Yet another silly question but I am not sure if I told you folks but I come from a very narrow minded non science background and was introduced to math and physics by my wife and by watching Bing Bang Theory and Doctor Who. Strangely more often than not as I learn more about sciende and math I also find myself becoming very critical of what I would see as possibly hokum. Is that normal?

It's important to balance criticism or skepticism with an open mind. It is a somewhat paradoxical idea, but one needs to be open to ideas even if they fly in the face of conventional wisdom.

You don't have to believe new ideas: I'm not saying that. All I'm saying is that you need to be aware of them in full before you criticize them and you have to criticize the message and not the messenger.

In fact large portions of mathematics are based on this very principle. When we want to disprove something we assume that something is true and find a contradiction. We don't just say "it's wrong".

Also I'm sure most mathematicians will tell you how much easier it is to disprove a general statement than to prove a general statement.
 
  • #13
That Feynman video is awesome. Thanks micromass!
 
  • #14
Evo said:
All of the "self help" people are shysters and manipulators.
micromass said:
Indeed, they are scum!

Nobody is brainwashing consumers into buying self help books (except Oprah). If people want to read a book that tells them how they might better their lives, it is not the vendors who should be judged.
 
  • #15
DaveC426913 said:
Nobody is brainwashing consumers into buying self help books (except Oprah). If people want to read a book that tells them how they might better their lives, it is not the vendors who should be judged.
Right, snake oil salesmen aren't to blame if gullible people buy it.
 
  • #16
DaveC426913 said:
Nobody is brainwashing consumers into buying self help books (except Oprah). If people want to read a book that tells them how they might better their lives, it is not the vendors who should be judged.

Isn't that the same as gambling halls/casinos? No one is "forcing" you to play, but people get addict it to it and want to "win it all back"
 
  • #17
Evo said:
Right, snake oil salesmen aren't to blame if gullible people buy it.

[STRIKE]The fact that many of us don't feel we need somebody else's ideas about how to be well-adjusted does not mean that they're selling snake oil.

I guess it really comes down to the fine line between fraudulent promises of medicinal miracles and merely advice on how to live well.

The snake oils salesman says "It's science, just trust me", and the self-help advisor says "it's just a bunch of ideas. There's nothing here beyond your ability to comprehend. I can't make you do anything."[/STRIKE]

Wait, wait. Are we talking The Secret and the Power of Attraction kind of self help?

Oh. OK, then total snake oil. That stuff is trash.

.
 
Last edited:
  • #18
DaveC426913 said:
The snake oils salesman says "It's science, just trust me", and the self-help advisor says "it's just a bunch of ideas. There's nothing here beyond your ability to comprehend. I can't make you do anything."
The complications come when the snake oil salesman calls himself a self-help advisor and says exactly what you've said "I can't make you do anything" whilst manipulating the consumer with lies, logical fallacies and a myriad other tricks of advertising.
 
  • #19
DaveC426913 said:
[STRIKE]The fact that many of us don't feel we need somebody else's ideas about how to be well-adjusted does not mean that they're selling snake oil.

I guess it really comes down to the fine line between fraudulent promises of medicinal miracles and merely advice on how to live well.

The snake oils salesman says "It's science, just trust me", and the self-help advisor says "it's just a bunch of ideas. There's nothing here beyond your ability to comprehend. I can't make you do anything."[/STRIKE]

Wait, wait. Are we talking The Secret and the Power of Attraction kind of self help?

Oh. OK, then total snake oil. That stuff is trash.


.


yes that is exactly what I was referring to
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
695